Maynard Institute archives

Covering a Racially Polarized Electorate

Updated Oct. 27, Oct. 28

AP Poll: 51% Express Explicit Anti-Black Attitudes

Did Debate Commission “Play” the Journalist Groups?

Stephen A. Smith Denies Uttering N-Word on Air

BET, Bossip, Madame Noire Rise Among Black Sites

NAHJ Says Use of “Illegal” Can Lead to Violence

Paul DeMain Isn’t Joining Tributes to Russell Means

Special Olympics Athlete Responds to Ann Coulter Slur

Short Takes

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the Republican, has garnered 50 percent o

AP Poll: 51% Express Explicit Anti-Black Attitudes

The 2012 election is shaping up to be more polarized along racial lines than any presidential contest since 1988, with President Obama experiencing a steep drop in support among white voters from four years ago,” Jon Cohen and Rosalind S. Helderman reported Thursday for the Washington Post.

“At this stage in 2008, Obama trailed Republican John McCain by seven percentage points among white voters. Even in victory, Obama ended up losing white voters by 12 percentage points, according to that year’s exit poll.

“But now, Obama has a deficit of 23 percentage points, trailing Republican Mitt Romney by 60 percent to 37 percent among whites, according to the latest Washington Post-ABC News national tracking poll. That presents a significant hurdle for the president — and suggests that he will need to achieve even larger margins of victory among women and minorities, two important parts of the Democratic base, to win reelection.”

[Sonya Ross and Jennifer Agiesta reported Saturday for the Associated Press, “Racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the United States elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll finds, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.”]

While the implications of this poll have not been prominent in mainstream news coverage, pundits of color have been commenting on the phenomenon for some time.

Veteran journalist Les Payne wrote Friday on the Root, “. . . Alas, in this year of our Lord 2012, the Republican Party structurally is 97.9 percent non-African American, fielding only 47 blacks among the 4,411 delegates at its Tampa convention!

“With blacks constituting some 13 percent of the electorate, the GOP, win or lose, is likely to register a popular vote that is 99.5 percent non-African American. And this near lily-white party operates in a diverse republic — with a black president, who attracted 43 percent of the white vote in ’08.

“. . . Seldom, if ever, are whites queried about voting for the candidate of a predominantly white party, who is so shameless a panderer that even ranking party officials are knocked into a quandary over what exactly he believes. So the question arises:

“Are whites voting against Obama chiefly because he’s black?”

On the Grio, David A. Love Thursday found the poll results of a piece with the GOP’s recent strategy:

. . . Republicans have doubled down on intolerance, xenophobia, and the shunning of racial diversity as a winning strategy,” Love wrote. “Blacks, Latinos, Arabs, Muslims and others need not apply — or vote, for that matter. They are not part of a winning Republican strategy. Rather than change their product to appeal to consumers who won’t buy it, the GOP has decided to eliminate those who won’t do business with them. Voter ID laws and Tea-Party-sponsored voter purge operations such as True the Vote are attempts to disenfranchise voters who will not vote Republican.”

Armstrong Williams, a black conservative commentator, wrote Thursday for the Hill, “. . . . American blacks don’t vote Republican because they can’t seem to identify with the platform and conscience of the GOP hierarchy. Many continue to feel unwelcome and underappreciated in the Grand Old Party.

. . . The Republicans need to take a page from the Democrats and do a better job of grooming black elected officials to carry their message into the community, because the black community is ripe for appeal.”

Eugene Robinson, writing Thursday for the Washington Post, said, “. . . Issues may explain our sharp political divisions, but they can’t be the cause of our demographic polarization. White men need medical care, too. African Americans and Latinos understand the need to get our fiscal house in order. The recession and the slow recovery have taken a toll across the board.

“Some of Obama’s opponents have tried to delegitimize his presidency because he doesn’t embody the America they once knew. He embodies the America of now.”

Did Debate Commission “Play” the Journalist Groups?

Were the journalist of color associations “played” by the Commission on Presidential Debates?

After journalists of color were shut out of the debate questioning of the presidential and vice presidential candidates, Hugo Balta, president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists, and Anna Lopez Buck, NAHJ interim executive director, met in Washington Aug. 23 with Michael D. McCurry, co-chair of the Commission on Presidential Debates.

McCurry, press secretary to President Bill Clinton from 1995 to 1998, accepted Balta’s suggestion that the commission receive questions from the journalists of color and the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association for presentation to the moderators. McCurry acknowledged “that it would be very difficult (for the moderators) not to take advantage of such an offer,” Balta wrote at the time.

But it appeared that none of the questions were asked, despite an Oct. 1 statement from the commission’s Nancy Henrietta that “All questions submitted to the CPD have been forwarded to the moderators.”

The moderators and their network spokesmen have been reluctant to comment on whether they received the questions, but Edie Emery, a spokeswoman for CNN, spoke Friday on behalf of Candy Crowley, who moderated the second presidential debate. Emery told Journal-isms by email, “Candy moderated the Presidential town hall debate. All of the questions came from the town hall participants. Candy did not receive any questions from the CPD.”

Balta previously expressed his disappointment: “. . . Regardless of the outcome, NAHJ is committed to working with the CPD and media companies in ensuring that the list of experienced Latino candidates in 2016 is more robust than what it has been in 2012,” he said.

On Friday, Gregory H. Lee Jr., president of the National Association of Black Journalists, responded by email:

“It is disappointing that the commission disregarded the work of NABJ and the Unity alliance. Perhaps we should not be surprised at these developments when considering the lack of ethnic diversity among the moderators was a path the commission chose to take. When you examine that there were no questions taken from journalists of color and there were no journalists of color as moderators, they missed an opportunity to be more inclusive.”

McCurry could not be reached for comment.

[Balta told Journal-isms by email on Oct. 28: “I reached out to Mike McCurry tonight and he reaffirmed to me that all the moderators and their producers received the communications the CPD received from NAHJ and UNITY alliance and NABJ. McCurry once again made it clear to me that it was solely up to the moderators to determine the content of their questions.

[“He once again invited me to continue the discussion on how best to address the question of diversity when it comes to moderators as the CPD begins to assess the 2012 debates and starts thinking about 2016.”]

Stephen A. Smith insists that he did not really utter the N-word, that as a New Yorker he speaks quickly and his language can be misunderstood. Dahntay Jones of the Dallas Mavericks is at right. In this video, viewers can judge for themselves.

Stephen A. Smith Denies Uttering N-Word on Air

This morning Stephen A. Smith was in a ‘First Take’ debate about whether or not Kobe Bryant would play in the season opener,” Clay Travis wrote Thursday for outkickthecoverage.com.

“That’s par for the first take course, a ‘debate’ that no one really cares about and that has no lasting significance, delivered with stereo sound histrionics and Bay of Pigs level crisis threat. Ordinarily no one would have noticed. Except on this particular morning Smith dropped a ‘Nigga, please,’ to cement his point. He did not follow it up by saying, ‘you ain’t signing no checks like these,’ in which case he could just claim he was quoting a popular Jay-Z song.

“Later ESPN dropped the phrase from a reairing . . . [ESPN’s] official response: ‘Stephen A. Smith vehemently denies using any inappropriate language. We didn’t leave it on the re-air as we didn’t want to create more confusion if people misunderstood him.'”

Under the headline, “Memo to ESPN, Stephen A.: Enough BS,” fellow black sports commentator Jason Whitlock of Fox Sports took Smith and “First Take” to task on Friday.

“. . . I’m not going to waste a lot of time breaking down the weakness of Smith’s latest denial,” Whitlock wrote. “He dropped the N-word. The audio and video speak for themselves. Smith’s laughable denial — saying he’s from New York and sometimes speaks too ‘fastly’ — doesn’t even attempt to explain what he said if not ‘n—a, please.’

“Nope. The discussion today should focus on First Take, and why this particular show can’t avoid sprinkling the N-word into its discourse.

“. . . This is a horrendous look for black journalists. Where are the standards? How will we have any credibility the next time a white broadcaster says anything remotely racist if we sit quiet while Smith gets away with this?

“Smith owes us an apology and a few days off work to think about how to properly and respectfully use the immense broadcasting talents he’s been blessed with.”

BET, Bossip, Madame Noire Rise Among Black Sites

The BET, Bossip and Madame Noire websites recorded increases in unique visitors compared with June numbers, but HuffPost BlackVoices, the Grio and Essence sustained significant declines, according to September figures from the comScore research company.

BET.com was No. 1 among 17 African American-oriented websites for which Journal-isms requested ratings Friday. BET drew 3,191,000 unique visitors in September, compared with 2,851,000 in June. Second was MediaTakeOut, a site specializing in lurid celebrity gossip that for a time had been the top-viewed black-oriented website, with 2,564,000 unique visitors, compared with 2,256,000 in June.

Third was Bossip, a gossip site that last year ran photos of the miscarried fetus of rapper Joe Budden and model Esther Baxter. It drew 2,087,000 unique visitors in September, compared with 1,692,000 in June.

Fourth was HuffPost BlackVoices, which fell from 3,874,000 unique visitors in June to 1,791,000 in September, according to comScore.

“Like every news site, HuffPost Black Voices’ statistics fluctuate from month to month based on the nature of the stories,” Huffington Post spokesman Rhoades Alderson told Journal-isms Friday by email. “Pageviews were actually 35% higher in September compared to February even though UVs were lower. We are extremely happy with the performance of HuffPost Black Voices in the 15 months since its launch.” Alderson was asked about a comparison with February figures.

Madame Noire, which calls itself “a sophisticated lifestyle publication that gives African-American women the latest in fashion trends, black entertainment news, parenting tips and beauty secrets that are specifically for black women,” was fifth with 1,276,000 unique visitors, up from 815,000 in June.

The Grio, a black-oriented NBC News property, was sixth with 1,129,000 unique visitors, down from 1,646,000 in June.

[Meghan Pianta, spokeswoman for the Grio, emailed on Oct. 29, “Our POV on this is that as many in the digital space will tell you, comScore does not always accurately represent what internal tracking numbers show. Our September numbers from Omniture were much higher than what comScore reported.”]

Others were the Root, 1,106,000, down from 1,697,000 in June; Black Planet, 672,000, up from 581,000 in June; Essence, 652,000, down from 986,000 in June; Black America Web, 476,000, up from 294,000 in June; and EURWeb, 398,000, down from 529,000.

Lee Bailey of EURWeb said comScore does not have tracking code installed on his website and so cannot calculate visits properly. “Our internal (Google) Analytics show us averaging between 900k to 1 million unique per month over the last six months,” he said by email. “. . . it seems to me that based on our 900k plus average, the comScore should be no lower than 700k or 600k at the MOST.”

Traffic for other sites: Concrete Loop, 201,000, down from 248,000 in June; Clutch magazine, 152,000, up from 127,000 in June; Ebony, 115,000, up from 42,000; Hello Beautiful, 978,000, down from 996,000 in June; NewsOne, 910,000, down from 988,000 in June; and the YBF, 594,000. [Updated Oct. 29]

NAHJ Says Use of “Illegal” Can Lead to Violence

. . . NAHJ continues to condemn the use of the term ‘illegal immigrants,’ ‘illegal aliens’ and ‘illegals’ in describing people who are in this country without proper documentation,” Hugo Balta, president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists, wrote Thursday for Fox News Latino.

Hugo Balta

This month, New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan endorsed the newspaper’s policy of using “illegal immigrant,” and Tom Kent, deputy managing editor for standards and production at the Associated Press, defended AP’s use of the term, though he added, “The first thing to note is that ‘illegal immigrant’ is not the only term we use.”

Balta continued, “. . . Those demeaning titles are not only inaccurate and disrespectful, but a propaganda tool used to dehumanize a group of people and instill fear in the general population in order to establish policy.

“. . . It’s easy for someone to preach from behind an office desk about the proper meaning of words like illegal immigrant. It is irresponsible for them to think that those decisions do not have consequences; sometimes violent.”

Balta also quoted Fatma Marouf, co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Nevada William C. Boyd School of Law, who said “. . . the term ‘illegal immigrants’ erroneously suggests that anyone in the United States without legal status is a criminal. Unlawful presence in the United States is not — and never has been — a crime.”

Balta also said, “NAHJ has historically asked the media to use the term undocumented immigrants or undocumented worker. To use any other term when describing this group is an attempt to discredit them, question their motives for being in this country and silence their voice from the controversial immigration debate. . . .”

Paul DeMain Isn’t Joining Tributes to Russell Means

Paul DeMain, CEO of Indian Country Communications and editor of News From Indian Country, is not joining the outpouring of tributes to Russell Means, the American Indian Movement activist and actor who died on Monday at 72.

Russell Means

For more than 10 years, DeMain has investigated the case of Leonard Peltier and other Native activists. In 1977, Peltier was convicted and sentenced to two consecutive terms of life imprisonment for first-degree murder in the shooting of two FBI agents during a 1975 conflict on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Peltier’s supporters say he is innocent.

DeMain, a former president of the Native American Journalists Association and of Unity: Journalists of Color, does not agree. At the 2011 NAJA convention, he led a session on the 1975 kidnapping, torture and killing of Native activist Annie Mae Pictou Aquash, in which he questioned the actions of Means and AIM co-founder Dennis Banks.

Paul DeMaine

DeMain told Journal-isms by email, “. . . . how is it that mainstream media puts Means, Banks and Peltier on such a pedestal aside from the work that Native journalists did to expose the lies about Peltier being an innocent man.” He said that several informants, such as Pictou, Johnny Moore, Buddy LaMont and a black civil rights worker, Perry Ray Robinson, were murdered, and that the AIM leaders “have used their hollywood notoriety to be turned into spokespeople for the Native community when there [are] much more legitimate people to advise the media.

“It is a failure of the media as far as I can see. They no longer want to dwell or work on hard stories, especially when it is easier to quote some radical pretty Indian looking stereotype guy that has something cute to say all the time about anything you ask them about. AIM, Russ and Dennis have become the mascot and logos of Indian Country they fight against.”

Short Takes

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

Related posts

It’s the Content, Editors

richard

Sanchez, Contrite, Returns to Diversity Issue

richard

The Non-Wacko Jacko

richard

Leave a Comment