Maynard Institute archives

Praise for Obama, and Then a Dead Mic

by richard0656

President’s Eulogy in Charleston Made for Riveting TV

Mindset Behind Confederate Monuments Mirrors That for Flags

Can’t Fault Media for Not Reporting Charleston Story

Were They “Plantations” or “Slave Labor Camps”?

News Networks in Overdrive on Same-Sex Marriage Ruling

ProPublica Basks in Fair Housing Decision

Trump, Univision Battle After Insult to Mexicans

Japanese Native Tells Story of Navajo Code Talkers

Short Takes

President’s Eulogy in Charleston Made for Riveting TV

In full preacher mode, President Obama delivered riveting television Friday when he eulogized the Rev. Clementa Pinckney, a state senator, rising political star and one of the nine people killed last week at the Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C.

“President Barack Obama used his eulogy for a slain pastor to deliver an unvarnished lecture on America’s racial history Friday, and then boldly sang ‘Amazing Grace,’ a spiritual meant to summon hope in the darkest of times,” Meg Kinnard, Jeffrey Collins and Jonathan Drew wrote for the Associated Press.

The event touched them as black men, CNN’s Don Lemon and Van Jones said in analyzing the president’s remarks immediately afterward. They were joined by Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, another African American, and finally by CNN anchor Jake Tapper, who is white and who rebuffed a point Lemon made, giving viewers even more riveting television.

The Associated Press story also reported, ” ‘We do not know whether the killer of Rev. Pinckney and eight others knew all of this history,’ the president said. ‘But he surely sensed the meaning of his violent act. It was an act that drew on a long history of bombs and arsons and shots fired at churches; not random, but as a means of control, a way to terrorize and oppress.’

” ‘An act that he imagined would incite fear, and incrimination, violence and suspicion. An act he presumed would deepen divisions that trace back to our nation’s original sin,’ Obama continued, his voice rising in the cadence of the preachers who preceded him.

” ‘Oh, but God works in mysterious ways!’ Obama said, and the crowd rose to give him a standing ovation. ‘God has different ideas!’ . . .

“The president wrapped up the four-hour funeral in song, belting out the first words of ‘Amazing Grace’ all by himself. Ministers behind him quickly stood up and began singing, too, and the choir and organist and many in the audience of thousands joined in. . . .

“Throughout the four-hour ceremony, the ‘Mother Emanuel’ choir, hundreds strong, led roughly 6,000 people through rousing gospel standards between speakers. A banner alongside Pinckney’s closed coffin declared that the killer picked the ‘WRONG CHURCH! WRONG PEOPLE! WRONG DAY!’ . . .”

On Twitter, NPR’s Michele Norris, curator of its Race Card Project, tweeted, “Perhaps we should finally put to rest the notion that this President does not feel comfortable talking about race.”

ABC’s John Karl told viewers that it was “the most powerful speech I’ve heard him speak as president of the United States. This was also a call to action.”

CNN’s Jones left the Obama administration in its early months after attacks by conservatives. He and Lemon told CNN viewers that they had never heard a president speak that way. “He knows this is his legacy . . . I’ve never heard an organist come into a presidential speech,” Lemon remarked.

Lemon turned to Jones and asked, “How did you feel watching it as a black man?”

“I was proud, and I was terrified,” Jones responded. “I was afraid he might have some people terrified. Is somebody going to say, ‘He’s going to play the race card at a funeral’?”

Lemon replied, “I was saying, ‘go on, brother, if you don’t say it, nobody is going to say it, ‘ adding that he felt the same way as Jones.

Jones said Obama started his presidency as a bridge builder, then became a pinata and is now trying to be fearless. “Do we believe this level of candor?” Jones asked. “This is the most Christian speech I’ve heard.” He said its religiosity was bound to give pause to the “secular left.”

Brazile joined the conversation by phone, saying of the president, “He went someplace inside of his being where I’ve never seen him go. . . . I’ve been in enough black churches, never in my life would I have thought a president would do this. We must be honest with each other. This is who he is. He is a man of peace. He has spoken his truth.”

While this conversation continued on CNN, MSNBC was busy with interviews; Fox News Channel’s Chris Wallace had changed the subject to Benghazi and Hillary Clinton’s emails; and the broadcast networks and TV One had returned to regular programming. BET was still showing “Welcome Home, Roscoe Jenkins,” a Martin Lawrence movie.

On CNN, as Josh Feldman reported for Mediaite, “At one point, Brooke Baldwin brought on Jake Tapper to analyze the president’s comments too.

“Tapper recalled similarly moving speeches Obama gave going all the way back to 2007, when he was running for president and talking about race issues. And so this really reminded Tapper of Obama speaking at black churches on the campaign trail.

“Lemon offered a small note of disagreement, saying that back in those days, Obama always had to ‘hedge’ because of the next election or legislative battle, but now he has the freedom to ‘not care anymore.’ To Lemon, Obama’s eulogy was a clear indication of the president ‘preaching to the country,’ which represents a stark difference.

“Tapper then said, ‘I’m just going by reporting, I covered him on the campaign trail for two years and then at the White House for four, so, I mean, Don can think whatever he wants’.”

Lemon attempted to smooth things over. “I agree with Jake,” Lemon said. “He said the same words, but it can be different depending on your motivation.”

Feldman continued, “but then his mic was cut and Tapper continued speaking with Baldwin. . . .”

Mindset Behind Monuments Mirrors That for Flags

As the move to take down the Confederate battle flag gained momentum this week, a countervailing argument was gaining traction:

That the statues and monuments similarly canonizing the Confederacy should be left alone because they are not as “in your face” as a flag and are “a part of our history.”

“So that’s the distinction. The markers and monuments that pay tribute to our country’s history stay,” Washington Post columnist Petula Dvorak wrote on Friday. “Symbols of hatred go.”

A Post editorial Monday said, “Civil War memorials to fallen Confederate soldiers dot old battlefields on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line, and statues of rebel soldiers stand tall on city streets as nearby as Alexandria. But monuments that were erected long ago now do little more than acknowledge that past. As historical artifacts, they lack the political potency of the Confederate battle flag.

“Unlike memorials and statues, flags can become rallying cries for people — in this case, people like suspected shooter Dylann Roof — who believe in what they stand for.”

Confederate monuments and street names celebrate the same mindset, however. As President Obama said of flags in his eulogy on Friday, “For too long, we were blind to the pain that the Confederate flag stirred in too many of our citizens.

“It’s true, a flag did not cause these murders. But as people from all walks of life, Republicans and Democrats, now acknowledge — including [South Carolina] Governor [Nikki] Haley, whose recent eloquence on the subject is worthy of praise — as we all have to acknowledge, the flag has always represented more than just ancestral pride. For many, black and white, that flag was a reminder of systemic oppression and racial subjugation. We see that now. . . .”

On the “Diane Rehm Show,” an NPR program that originates at WAMU-FM in Washington, Isabel Wilkerson, author and black journalist, answered the argument that these symbols represent “heritage.” “What about the parks? What about the statues? What about the other symbols of the Confederacy that are around the country?” Rehm asked.

“Well, again . . . these are ways of . . . celebrating the subjugation of African Americans, of a huge population, a huge segment of the South,” Wilkerson replied. “I mean, we sometimes forget that African Americans are Southern, too. The South does not just include white Southerners. It is a very large region, and . . . there are many other ways to celebrate and recognize Southern identity than to celebrate a bruising war in this way. . . .”

Kirk Savage, an art historian who teaches at the University of Pittsburgh, told Journal-isms last month, “The monuments helped consolidate white supremacy across the South. They were the cultural arm of a political campaign that is still bearing its terrible fruit in Ferguson, Baltimore, and on and on. The monuments worked by uniting whites around the banner of the Lost Cause, rewriting the history of the Confederacy, and erasing the memory of Unionism and slavery and everything else that didn’t fit the Lost Cause picture. . . .”

New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu called this week for the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in that city. He explained that musician Wynton Marsalis helped persuade him. ” ‘I don’t like the fact that Lee Circle is named Lee Circle,’ Landrieu recalled Marsalis saying,” Robert McClendon reported Thursday for NOLA.com and the Times-Picayune.

“When the mayor asked why, Marsalis responded, ‘Let me help you see it through my eyes. Who is he? What does he represent? And in that most prominent space in the city of New Orleans, does that space reflect who we were, who we want to be or who we are?’ “

In an op-ed Friday headlined, “The Robert E. Lee Problem,” the New York Times’ David Brooks wrote of Lee, “Like Lincoln he did not believe African-Americans were yet capable of equality. Unlike Lincoln he accepted the bondage of other human beings with bland complaisance. His wife inherited 196 slaves from her father. Her father’s will (somewhat impractically) said they were to be freed, but Lee didn’t free them.

“Lee didn’t enjoy owning slaves, but he was considered a hard taskmaster and he did sell some, breaking up families. Moreover, he supported the institution of slavery as a pillar of Confederate life. He defended the right of Southerners to take their slaves to the Western territories. He fundamentally believed the existence of slavery was, at least for a time, God’s will. . .”

The Dallas Morning News on Friday urged the renaming of Dallas schools named after Lee and Stonewall Jackson. “The time has come to quit flaunting symbols that uphold romantic visions of the Old South. The time has come to quit pretending that secessionist states were driven by noble motives. The Civil War should be seen for what it was — a brutal, wasteful war over a southerner’s right to own, buy and sell human beings like livestock,” the editorial board said.

The board also wrote, “Remember Oak Cliff’s Jefferson Davis Elementary School, named for the Kentucky-born president of the Confederacy? [The Dallas Independent School District] renamed the campus in 1999 for the late Texas congresswoman and civil rights leader Barbara Jordan.”

Can’t Fault Media for Not Reporting Charleston Story

“As soon as the news of a tragic racist murder in a South Carolina church broke last Wednesday night, social media got busy — hating on the mainstream media,” Liza Featherstone wrote Tuesday for the New York Observer.

“The night of the shooting, actor Rob Lowe tweeted just after midnight, ‘The media should be ashamed. 3 hours to get on air and then gives detailed suspect description WITHOUT mentioning his race.’ The same night, in another tweet typical of left social media’s response, someone going by the handle 3ChicsPolitico agreed: ‘I am furious w/ the media. A mass shooting at a black church … & no coverage. ?#BlackLivesMatter dammit!’

“But how did Lowe and other keyboard warriors know that a white man had killed nine black people in Charleston, anyway? From the evil mainstream media so intent on concealing it, of course.

“In fact, the race of the shooter, and his racist motivations, were reported quickly — and widely — along with the evidence of [suspect Dylann] Roof’s attraction to white supremacist ideologies.

“And why wouldn’t those details be reported? The killing of nine respectable, church-going Americans, during Bible study, by an unsympathetic, racist white thug is just the kind of story the mainstream media can do well.

“The media may struggle with explanations of how institutionalized racism and poverty persist in South Carolina (or Ferguson or New York), or even to report, without bias, on police violence against individuals lacking social power, like Michael Brown or Freddie Gray.

“But the shooting in Charleston was not like these stories. It required neither an understanding of political economy nor the desire to transcend the politics of respectability. Give the media a clear moral narrative with good guys and bad guys — and with emotional resonance to most middle-class news consumers — and we are there. The shooting in Charleston was just such a story. . . .”

Were They “Plantations” or “Slave Labor Camps”?

The battle of ideas over how to remember the Confederacy is also one of language, as Harold Meyerson, a Washington Post op-ed columnist, noted on Wednesday. He discussed the recent book “The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism” by Cornell University history professor Edward E. Baptist.

“In the early decades of the 19th century, as the tobacco fields of Virginia and Maryland played out, and Native Americans were forcibly expelled from Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi, more than 800,000 slaves, largely from the Mid-Atlantic region, were sold to the cotton planters who’d taken the Native Americans’ lands.

“Those relocated slaves — their families sundered — invariably spoke or wrote, when they were able to leave recollections behind, of how much harsher and more systemically violent was the regimen inflicted on them after they were forced to move to the Deep South cotton belt (most frequently on foot, in chained processions).

“Nor was the violence random: Lashings and beatings were characteristically inflicted on slaves who failed to meet their daily quotas of pounds of picked cotton.

“Baptist buttresses those recollections with numbers. The cotton-harvesting productivity of the individual slave more than doubled between 1820 and 1860. In the first decade of this period, a strain of cotton that was easier to pick was introduced, but most of this productivity revolution occurred after it became commonplace — and in the absence of any technological innovation that would have made the cotton-picking easier or faster.

“Combining these numbers with the testimony of slaves and visitors to the pre-Civil War South, Baptist concludes that this productivity revolution was the result of the routinization of extreme physical violence on slaves. At the center of the antebellum economy, Baptist writes, was ‘the threat of torture.’

“Baptist acknowledges that ‘torture’ is not a word we usually associate with American slavery, but he makes a convincing case that we should. His other neologistic innovation is his substitution for the word ‘plantations.’ He calls them ‘slave labor camps,’ and on a moment’s reflection, it’s hard to see why his usage shouldn’t become ours as well. What’s a plantation, after all, but a slave labor camp with a big house built by slave labor? . . .”

News Networks in Overdrive on Same-Sex Marriage Ruling

“For the second morning in a row the news networks went into overdrive as the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling: same sex marriage is a right protected by the U.S. constitution,” Chris Ariens reported Friday for TVNewser.

“At 10:01, a breathless Shannon Bream on Fox News was handed the decision: ‘Here. Here. Here we go. We have got it.’

“NBC’s justice correspondent Pete Williams got choked up reading the decision in an NBC News special report at 10:02. ‘For the first time the Supreme Court has said there is a constitutional right — excuse me — to same sex marriage.’

“On CNN, Wolf Blitzer anchored a global special report for CNN networks at 10:02, but, like yesterday, they delayed reporting the actual decision, even while people outside the court, in a CNN split screen, celebrated the ruling.

” ‘It’s over. The long constitutional debate over whether gay couples have a constitutional right to marry is over. And the answer is yes,’ said ABC’s Terry Moran in a network special report anchored by David Muir at 10:03.

” ‘You cannot imagine the roar of the court when the decision was announced,’ said Jan Crawford reporting a special report for CBS News, also at 10:03. . . .”

ProPublica Basks in Fair Housing Decision

“A sharply divided Supreme Court on Thursday preserved a key tool used for more than four decades to fight housing discrimination, handing a surprising victory to the Obama administration and civil rights activists,” Sam Hananel reported Thursday for the Associated Press.

“The justices ruled 5-4 that federal housing law allows people to challenge lending rules, zoning laws and other housing practices that have a harmful impact on minority groups, even if there is no proof that companies or government agencies intended to discriminate. . . .”

The editors of ProPublica reported the decision and added, “ProPublica in 2012 detailed how the U.S. government rarely enforced the many provisions of the Fair Housing Act. And earlier this year, we looked at the issues at stake in the ‘disparate impact’ case decided Thursday. . . “

ProPublica reposted its Oct. 29, 2012, report by Nikole Hannah-Jones, now with the New York Times Magazine.

Japanese Native Tells Story of Navajo Code Talkers

“Kenji Kawano is perhaps best known for his photographs of the Navajo code talkers recruited by the Marines to communicate military orders in their own language in World War II, baffling the Japanese,” Monica Almeida reported Thursday for the New York Times “Lens” blog.

“Around 400 young men, who had never been away from the reservation, served in some of the bloodiest battles in the South Pacific and are credited with helping win the battle of Iwo Jima.

“As a Japanese native, and thus a ‘former enemy,’ Mr. Kawano might have seemed an unlikely candidate to tell the code talkers’ story. But his background is what helped him bond with the Navajo veterans who had remained silent for so many years. Soon after he had settled into the Navajo Nation in 1974 to work on a project, he was struggling to learn the language. . . .”

Short Takes

 

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

 

 

 

 

Related posts

Jayson Blair Defiant in First Full-Scale Interview

richard

What if the “Militants” Were Not White?

richard

Olmeda to Lead Latino Journalists

richard

Leave a Comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.