Poverty Issue “Nearly Invisible” in Election Coverage
Latinos Author Only 1/2 of 1% of Big-Paper Op-Eds
Pundits Mixed on Obama’s Convention Speech
BET’s Lee Says GOP “Pandered” to Blacks, Women
Bill Clinton’s Role Seen as Shoring Up Whites
At Key Points, Spanish Networks Aired Novelas
Jeremy Lin Stars in Impromptu “60 Minutes” Short
Coverage of Native Americans Steeped in Stereotypes
Poverty Issue “Nearly Invisible” in Election Coverage
“ ‘Middle Class First,’ said the placards on display as Bill Clinton addressed the Democratic convention. And indeed, speaker after speaker has invoked the party’s devotion to the lot of middle-class Americans in 2012,” David Crary reported Friday for the Associated Press. “The rich also have featured in the rhetoric, albeit as a punching bag.
“But the poor? Not so much. They’ve been mentioned only fleetingly.
“The discrepancy makes sense for President Barack Obama‘s strategy. A large majority of Americans identify themselves as middle class, while the poor lack political clout for a host of reasons. Yet for a party long known for its role as defender of the downtrodden, the rhetorical patterns are striking. . . .”
As for the Republicans, Thomas B. Edsall wrote recently in the New York Times that rather than ignoring poor people of color, the GOP is casting them as the enemy. “The Republican ticket is flooding the airwaves with commercials that develop two themes designed to turn the presidential contest into a racially freighted resource competition pitting middle class white voters against the minority poor,” Edsall wrote.
These stories coincide with a new report by Mariana Garces and Steve Rendall of Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, “Media Not Concerned About the Very Poor: Study finds poverty not an issue in most election coverage.”
“. . . Poverty as an issue is nearly invisible in U.S. media coverage of the 2012 election, a new FAIR study has found — even though what candidates plan to do about an alarmingly growing poverty rate would seem to be a ripe topic for discussion in campaign coverage,” Garces and Rendall wrote for the September issue of FAIR’s “Extra!”
“Even before the economic downturn made the poverty picture significantly worse in the United States, the Urban Institute reported that half of all Americans (51 percent) experience poverty at some time before age 65 (Urban Institute, 9/10/09).”
“. . . To see how this crisis is addressed in coverage of the 2012 presidential election, Extra! looked at six months of campaign coverage (1/1/12–6/23/12) by eight prominent news outlets: CBS Evening News, ABC World News, NBC Nightly News, PBS NewsHour and NPR’s All Things Considered, and the print editions of the New York Times, Washington Post and Newsweek.
“. . . Despite its widely experienced impact, FAIR’s study found poverty barely registers as a campaign issue. Just 17 of the 10,489 campaign stories studied (0.2 percent) addressed poverty in a substantive way. Moreover, none of the eight outlets included a substantive discussion of poverty in as much as 1 percent of its campaign stories.
“Discussions of poverty in campaign coverage were so rare that PBS NewsHour had the highest percentage of its campaign stories addressing poverty — with a single story, 0.8 percent of its total. ABC World News, NBC Nightly News, NPR’s All Things Considered, and Newsweek ran no campaign stories substantively discussing poverty.
“. . . Previous FAIR reports and Extra! articles (7–8/06, 9–10/07) have discussed reasons journalists find the subject of poverty unappealing: ‘For one, journalists like a story to have a resolution, preferably a happy one’ — unlike poverty, which they see as ‘a sad, intractable fact of life, a story that never gets better and generates little interest or news.’ Perhaps more importantly, advertisers aren’t fond of poverty stories, which don’t provide a good media environment for their commercials. . . .”
- Julia Cass, Children’s Defense Fund: Children of Hard Times (2010)
- David J. Lynch, Bloomberg News: First Black President Can’t Help Blacks Stem Wealth Drop
- Leonard Pitts Jr., Miami Herald: Poor are not part of narrative for either convention
- David Rohde, Reuters: Parsing Romney’s and Obama’s middle-class pablum
- Andrea Tantaros, Daily News, New York: Blue pills, green cards and gay marriage
- Wendy Wang, Pew Research Center: Public Says a Secure Job Is the Ticket to the Middle Class (Aug. 31)
- Rod Watson, Buffalo News: Ignoring the obvious on low wages
Latinos Author Only 1/2 of 1% of Big-Paper Op-Eds
“Since 1990, the Latino population in the United States has more than doubled to 16 percent, but English-language U.S. news media outlets are simply not keeping up,” Julie Hollar wrote for the September edition of Extra!, a publication of Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting. “While people of color and women have always been underrepresented in U.S. media, Latinos consistently stand out — in the coverage as well as inside the newsroom — for their exceptionally paltry numbers relative to their population size.
“In Extra!’s recent study of the opinion pages of the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal (4/12), Latinos were granted less than half a percent of the op-ed bylines over the two-month study period — writing two columns in the Times, one in the Wall Street Journal, and none in the Post. None of these papers has a Latino among their staff columnists.
“In more than a year of political book interviews on [C-SPAN’s] After Words and reviews in the New York Times Book Review (Extra!, 8/10), not a single U.S. Latino appeared among the 432 authors, reviewers and interviewers.
“. . . Even when the coverage directly involves and impacts Latinos, their voices are scarce. In a year’s worth of cable coverage of Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio — who was recently sued by the Justice Department for unlawful discrimination against Latinos — those actually targeted by his policies were included in the conversation only two out of 21 times (Extra!, 6/09).”
“. . . As companies like Fox and NBC begin to target Latino audiences with special channels and websites (see ‘Latinos in New Media,’ Extra!, 9/12), will those audiences feel better served, or just ghettoized and exploited? And will that provide just one more excuse for those outlets to continue to marginalize Latino sources and reporters in their other news? . . .”
- Richard Prince, the Masthead, Association of Opinion Journalists: For op-ed diversity, give editing, mentoring (June 8)
Pundits Mixed on Obama’s Convention Speech
“Pundits had a mixed reaction to President Obama’s speech at the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night,” Katherine Fung reported Friday for the Huffington Post. “Overall, the rapturous reception given to Michelle Obama and Bill Clinton was left at the media doorstep.
“Most agreed that, rhetorically, Obama delivered a solid speech, saying that it was typical of the president’s strong oratorical skills. Not surprisingly, MSNBC was home to some of the most glowing commentary. Chris Matthews remarked that Obama ‘did it again’ and delivered ‘a home run speech.’ Al Sharpton said the address was ‘epic,’ and speculated that ‘Barack Obama won the election tonight.’ Rachel Maddow called it a ‘big, big speech.’
“. . . At CNN, former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer labeled the address a ‘hit and a miss.’ He criticized Obama for giving what he said was the ‘same old… same speech’ that he said contained ‘many of the promises’ from four years ago. . . .”
Meanwhile, the president’s speech “fueled a outpouring of tweets,” Cory Bergman wrote Thursday for lostremote.com. “Twitter called it a ‘record political moment,’ adding that Obama’s next two biggest spikes (43,646 and 39,002) surpassed Romney’s peak at 14,239,” referring to Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate. “In all, 9 million tweets about the DNC this week were sent by the conclusion of the president’s speech.”
- Chris Ariens, TVNewser: FNC, NBC Claim Wins Over Six Days of Conventions
- Jenice Armstrong, Philadelphia Daily News: Michelle Obama, Ann Romney show their strengths
- Kevin Cirilli, Politico: TV pundits split on Obama’s convention speech
- Michael Cottman, blackamericaweb.com: Obama Hits the Road
- Bill Cromwell, medialifemagazine.com: Clinton talk proves a big draw at DNC
- Mary C. Curtis, Washington Post: Obama’s speech adjusted for more constrained circumstances
- Michael Eric Dyson and Glen Ford with Amy Goodman on “Democracy Now!,” Pacifica Radio: “Effective Evil” or Progressives’ Best Hope? Glen Ford vs. Michael Eric Dyson on Obama Presidency
- Sam Fulwood III, theGrio.com: Obama at the DNC: How different is America from what he hoped for in 2004?
- Krystal Glass, Clutch magazine: The Undeniable Aura of the First Black Lady…And Black Women in General
- Emil Guillermo blog, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund: The President’s Speech: Obama’s “New Deal” — America’s Basic Bargain
- Rick Horowitz, YouTube: “Obama Hasn’t Done Anything!” (video)
- Tom Joyner, blackamericaweb.com: Unconditional Voting
- Howard Kurtz, Daily Beast: Are the Media Going Soft on the Democrats?
- John McWhorter, Daily News, New York: How Obama fell flat
- Andrea Morabito, Broadcasting & Cable: NBC, CNN Top Ratings in Final Night of DNC
- Ruben Navarrette Jr., Washington Post News Media Services: Ambivalent in Charlotte
- Pew Center for the People & the Press: Obama in a Word: From ‘Inexperienced’ and ‘Change’ to ‘Good’ and ‘Trying’
- Leonard Pitts Jr., Miami Herald: DNC and the Catholic nun on the bus
- Rochelle Riley, Detroit Free Press: For 4 young voters, Obama has more explaining to do
- Eugene Robinson, Washington Post: The tale of two conventions favors Obama
- Alex Weprin, TVNewser: Scott Pelley Gets First Post-DNC Interview With Pres. Obama
BET’s Lee Says GOP “Pandered” to Blacks, Women
” ‘They’re pandering,’ she said on a POLITICO LIVE show filmed here. ‘That’s the word that comes to mind.’
” ‘I thought some of what went on at the RNC was very disingenuous,’ she added. ‘Ann Romney has to [give a] shout-out to women? We’re over 50 percent of the population. We need a shout-out? It was the craziest-looking thing.’
“Lee said it was ‘nice’ that Rice sat next to Mitt Romney at the GOP convention, ‘but does the RNC really embrace African-Americans, really embrace women?’ “
- Nicole Balin, HuffPost BlackVoices: Interracial Dating in 2012 and What Paul Ryan’s Ex Means
- Esther Iverem, SeeingBlack.com: The Normalization of Hate
- Eugene Kane blog, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Can Romney win with just white votes? Depends.
- Julianne Malveaux, National Newspaper Publishers Association: Who Built What?
- Mary Sanchez, Kansas City Star: Memo to GOP: Demography is destiny
- Gary Younge, the Nation: Behind the GOP’s Diversity Display
Bill Clinton’s Role Seen as Shoring Up Whites
“Wednesday night, reporter John Frank tweeted that North Carolina delegates to the Democratic National Convention were sharing high-fives after former President Bill Clinton‘s epic 45-minute address,” Chris Kromm wrote Thursday for the Institute for Southern Studies.
“No surprise there: Clinton’s tour-de-force was a huge hit with Democrats of all flavors in Charlotte and nationally.
“But the speech also had a specific goal: to help sell President Obama and the Democratic brand to whites — including Southern whites — who have been an increasingly challenging demographic for the party.
“A pre-convention Gallup poll found Bill Clinton has a 63 percent approval rating among whites, compared to just 43 percent for Barack Obama. And as Richard Harpootlian, a Democrat from South Carolina told the Associated Press, ‘[Clinton] resonates with Southern white folks dramatically . . .’ “
Michael Oreskes wrote Wednesday for the Associated Press: “The numbers tell a story. President Obama was viewed favorably by 43 percent of white men in an AP-GfK poll last month. It is a key reason this race is so close. Overall, [Mitt] Romney beat Obama 54 to 39 percent among white voters in that poll.” As for Clinton, “12 years out of office, he is viewed favorably by 63 percent of white men, according to a Gallup Poll in July.”
- Andrea Morabito, Multichannel News: Clinton Speech Perks Up Cable Ratings in DNC’s Second Night
At Key Points, Spanish Networks Aired Novelas
A Journal-isms reader messaged Wednesday, “Would love to see you write and ask why the largest Spanish-language networks in the country, time after time, continue to take Spanish-speaking viewers for granted. Tonight the first undocumented immigrant to speak in a political convention took the stage… Last night the first Latino to address a DNC…. but you wouldn’t know if you are watching Univision or Telemundo playing novelas instead… Yet complaining anchors like Jorge Ramos are asking for a Presidential debate and Latino journalist inclusion?
Journal-isms posed the question to Univision and Telemundo on Thursday.
Monica Talan, a Univision spokeswoman replied by email, “We have offered comprehensive coverage, here is a link to the release with our plans, which included airing both acceptance speeches.
Alfredo Richard, a spokesman for Telemundo, said by email, “All I can tell you is we have been covering and reporting from both the RNC and DNC on the ground every day. Jose Diaz Balart and the Telemundo News team, working closely with NBC News, [have] been covering in detail all aspects of the conventions throughout the whole day starting with our morning show Un Nuevo Dia, our news magazine Al Rojo Vivo and broadcasting our Noticiero directly from Tampa and Charlotte. In addition, tonight, just like with [GOP candidate Mitt] Romney, we’re presenting a recap and highlights of the speech at 11:30pm ET and mun2, our young Latinos cable network, carried both acceptance speeches.”
Isabel Bucaram, a spokeswoman for CNN en Español, said her network did broadcast the Republican and Democratic convention speeches with simultaneous translations.
- Paul Farhi, Washington Post: For media, convention coverage is expensive but essential
- Sara Gates, HuffPost LatinoVoices: Julian Castro’s Spanish Skills: Does It Matter That The Latino Mayor ‘Doesn’t Really Speak’ Español?
- Tim Padgett, Time: The Time Has Come for an English Language Latino Network
- Cherie Saunders, eurweb.com: Gwen Ifill: Come to PBS for True [Unbiased] Election Coverage
Short Takes
- “For nearly two decades from 1915 to 1934, Oakland Tribune columnist Delilah L. Beasley chronicled the lives and activities of African-Americans both locally and across the country,” Annalee Allen wrote Sunday for the Oakland Tribune. “She was the first African-American woman to write for a major metropolitan daily newspaper, according to history files. . . . On Sept. 15, Progressive Oakland Women for Empowerment and Reform, or POWER, is hosting the annual Ms. Delilah Beasley Tea from 2 to 4 p.m. in the gardens of the historic Pardee Home Museum, 672 11th Street, in Oakland. . . . POWER also plans to bestow a lifetime achievement award to longtime television Belva Davis at the event.”
- “Juan Williams says he’s getting flak at the Democratic National Convention for working at Fox News,” Politico reported Wednesday, posting a clip of Williams being interviewed in Charlotte, N.C., by Fox News Channel host Bill O’Reilly. Williams acknowledged he was “stigmatized,” but quickly added, “I don’t mind it. That’s who I work for. I’m a proud employee. You guys bailed me out,” an apparent reference to the network’s signing Williams to a three-year contract worth nearly $2 million after he was fired in 2010 by NPR, where he was on contract. Williams had said that seeing airline passengers in “Muslim garb” would made him nervous, and his abrupt termination caused an uproar.
- “. . . The gay press and gay news blogs continue to have the most comprehensive coverage of LGBT issues (see especially Towleroad, the Advocate, The Washington Blade, and LA Frontiers),” Jennifer Vanasco wrote Friday for Columbia Journalism Review, “but the mainstream press is quickly catching up. The New York Times and the Associated Press may have occasional flubs but their strong coverage of LGBT issues overall is a shining example of how social minority groups should be covered: with respect and attention, writing both about a group’s unique issues as well as including them in stories that highlight the ordinary, human qualities we all share.”
- “There will be no reprieve for the newspaper industry in 2012, judging by the second quarter of the year, which saw yet another round of dismal returns,” Erik Sass reported Wednesday for Media Daily News. “Total advertising revenues dipped 6.4% from $6 billion in the second quarter of 2011 to $5.6 billion in the second quarter of 2012, according to the Newspaper Association of America. Print ad revenues dropped 7.9% from $5.2 billion to $4.8 billion, while online ad revenue growth remained anemic with a 2.9% increase from $803 million to $827 million.”
- “Apple and Google, the two biggest powerhouses in Silicon Valley, have stepped up the battle to make their smartphones smarter so they can grab ever-larger shares of the local advertising market,” Alan D. Mutter reported Wednesday for Editor & Publisher. “Their efforts are a major threat to newspapers hoping to capitalize on the enviable power of their local franchises to become significant players in the vigorously growing mobile space. Unfortunately, newspapers are woefully behind. . . .”
- “A six-year legal battle between a group of Native Americans and the Washington Redskins over the football team’s name continues today, as attorneys for the Native American petitioners plan to file papers asking federal authorities to strike down several of the team’s trademark registrations for ‘Redskins’ on the grounds that it is a racial slur,” Catherine Ho wrote Thursday for the Washington Post.
- In addition to naming Teresa Wiltz a deputy editor, reported here on Monday, Essence magazine announced that writer and “Today” show contributor Lola Ogunnaike will cover pop culture and lifestyle topics and author and Dr. Julianne Malveaux, the economist and columnist, will cover politics and the 2012 presidential election. Bob Meadows, a deputy editor, has left the publication.
- In New York, Bob Law, a nationally syndicated broadcast veteran who for many years could be heard across the nation on his radio “Night Talk” talk show, “convened a hearing in Harlem where Blacks voiced their concerns and politicians vowed not to let Black talk radio disappear without a fight,” Saeed Shabazz reported Tuesday for the Final Call.
- Also in New York, “The big news of the August PPM [Portable People Meter ratings] is all about WBLS. The Urban Adult Contemporary station is finding new life since the ESPN/KISS FM deal in April,” Jerry Barmash reported Thursday for FishbowlNY. “WBLS, now the only game in town for that format, jumped to number two, up .4 to 6.3.” In April, WRKS, or KISS-FM, a mainstay among African-American listeners in the area, became a sports talk station.
- “The Indian government’s response to a report on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh published Wednesday by the Washington Post has had the local media heatedly debating the validity of the article and India’s sensitive reaction to foreign publications finding fault with its leaders,” Amrutha Gayathri wrote Friday for International Business Times. The government was angered that Simon Denyer, the Post’s India bureau chief, “failed to attribute in his story two quotes — from historian Ramachandra Guha and the prime minister’s former media advisor Sanjaya Baru — to the Indian magazine, Caravan, which originally published the quotes in an article last year.” The Post issued a correction.
- “After weeks of the media mostly failing to realize why basketball star Yao Ming‘s trip to Kenya was fairly important endangered species news, the terrifying surge in elephant poaching in Africa is finally getting the treatment it deserves,” Curtis Brainard wrote Thursday for Columbia Journalism Review. “On Tuesday, The New York Times published a 3,100-word, front-page article by Jeffrey Gettleman that spotlighted the startling involvement of African militiamen and soldiers in the slaughter of thousands of elephants of the last few years. Gettleman likened the ivory they harvest to blood diamonds . . .”
- “Early this year, Dominican journalist Johnny Alberto Salazar was sentenced to six months in jail for slander and libel,” Alison Bethel McKenzie, executive director of the International Press Institute, wrote Friday. “. . . IPI is actively campaigning for the governments of the Caribbean to redress their current criminal libel laws. At present, the law is vague and open to indiscriminate and inconsistent implementation, largely wielded to quell dissent and stifle government criticism.”
- “Hardly ever do Nigerian journalists get justice for assaults suffered in the line of duty,” Peter Nkanga wrote Wednesday for the Committee to Protect Journalists. “But things may be set to change with the case of Benedict Uwalaka, a photojournalist with Leadership Newspapers, who on August 9 was brutally assaulted at a government hospital in Lagos State. The first step toward justice came 22 days later, when Bayo Ogunsola, one of the assailants identified by Uwalaka, was arraigned in court on August 31 on a two-count charge of assault and destruction of the journalist’s camera. . . .”
Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor
Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.