Site icon journal-isms.com

Trayvon’s Friend Ignites Social Media

Rachel Jeantel Personifies Race, Class, Culture Clash

Paula Deen Story Should Really Be About the Workplace

Gay People “All Over the Airwaves” on Wednesday

Voting Rights Challenges Likely Across the Nation

Drops in Black Enrollment Follow Affirmative Action Curbs

The Root, Black America Web Seeking Editors

Kenneth Noble, Former N.Y. Times Writer, Seriously Ill

Charles Pugh, Broadcaster-Turned-Pol, Stripped of Salary

D.C. Anchor Shakes Nerves, Throws Out First Pitch

Short Takes

Rachel Jeantel Personifies Race, Class, Culture Clash

When Rachel Jeantel testified in her friend Trayvon Martin’s murder trial yesterday she was called fat, ignorant, sassy, ugly and manly,” journalist Sherri Williams wrote Thursday.

“Jeantel was called everything except what she is, a witness in one of the most significant criminal trials in recent history – a young woman who heard her friend fight for his life.

“Social media users called Jeantel a thug, an embarrassment to humanity and to black America. Some joked that she is worthy of a Saturday Night Live skit, a living stereotype, an example of America’s failing education system.” Williams compiled some of the tweets on Storify.

“Those tweets reveal some of the things that some Americans believe is wrong with this country, but more deeply, what’s wrong with young black women,” she continued. “Attacks on Jeantel’s hair, body, speech, grammar and attitude all seemed to be proof for social media users that young black women are fools.

Jason Johnson, a political science and communication professor at Hiram College and frequent commentator on politics, elaborated on the HLN website: “Some people see a surly, unreliable witness who’s been caught telling several whoppers over the last year. Others see your average working class teenage girl, trying her best to stay composed while re-telling the story of the death of her close friend under the most grueling of circumstances.

“Which one did you see? It probably has a lot to do with what demographic boxes you check to identify yourself. . . .”

Eric Deggans, media critic for the Tampa Bay (Fla.) Times, wrote in the same vein:

“What so much of this really revealed was the gulf between middle-aged, middle class, mainstream codes of behavior and life among youth from poorer, non-white neighborhoods,” Deggans wrote.

He added, “This is a question that’s hovered over the Trayvon Martin shooting since the story burst onto the national stage more than a year ago.

“As each side on this murder trial tries to prove the other person had tendencies toward prejudice and violence which may have sparked the fight, how will jurors judge the difference between edgy culture and outright dysfunction?

Writing for the Nation Thursday, Mychal Denzel Smith introduced readers to the drama:

“Rachel Jeantel was the last person to speak to Trayvon Martin before George Zimmerman killed him on the night of February 26, 2012. On the third day of Zimmerman’s murder trial, after opening statements that featured the words ‘fucking punks’ and [a] knock-knock joke, and testimony from a number of witnesses, Rachel took the stand.

“Visibly shaken, Rachel recounted the details of her phone conversation with Trayvon the night he was killed. She says he told her that a ‘creepy-ass cracker’ was watching him. He attempted to lose him, but the man kept following, at which point Rachel suggested that Trayvon run. The phone was disconnected shortly after, and when the two were reconnected, Trayvon told Rachel, ‘The nigga is behind me.’ Rachel then heard a bump, the sounds of ‘wet grass,’ and what she thought to be Trayvon saying, ‘Get off.’

“The court took a recess after the state was finished questioning Rachel, as she was too broken up to continue at that moment. When they returned, Don West, a lawyer on Zimmerman’s defense team, resumed the questioning. Rachel’s demeanor noticeably shifted. She became agitated, answering West’s questions with quick ‘yes’es and exasperated ‘no’s. The more tedious the questions, the more frustrated she became.

“She was looking at a man trying to get someone off for killing her friend. West was doing what a defense lawyer does, of course, by trying to catch Rachel in a lie, poke holes in her story and cast doubt on her credibility. And the way she responded reflected the fact she knew exactly what was going on and she was determined not to let him rattle her. She may have frustrated him just as much as he did her.

“Rachel’s testimony is an emotional reminder of just what happened. A teenage boy was killed. His family and friends were left to mourn. For some of them, the pain is still fresh. The man responsible walked free for more than a month. There’s a possibility he could be found not guilty. . . .”

In an interview with Matt Lauer Wednesday on NBC’s “Today” show, Paula Deen says the using the N-word is “just not a part” of who she is. (video)

Paula Deen Story Should Really Be About the Workplace

“So I read the Paula Deen deposition — all 149 pages,” columnist Fannie Flono wrote Thursday in the Charlotte (N.C.) Observer.

“I wanted to see for myself what all the fuss was about. Surely, it had to be about more than her long ago use of the N-word.

“It was.

“Deen does not come off looking good in this deposition. But it’s not because of her too cavalier admission that she once — maybe more than once — used a racial slur.

“That can be forgiven.

“No, the deposition offers a more plausible reason why companies are running from her like she’s doused with toxic chemicals. Her big problem may not be the N-word; and not the R-word — racist — either, a characterization which she and her fans, blacks and whites, deny. The deposition homes in on the D-word and the H-word: Discrimination and harassment.

“Media attention has almost exclusively focused on Deen’s potty-mouth and racially insensitive utterances, from the past and more recently. That’s delicious fun for some to read about and use to skewer Deen. But she tearfully and rightly points out that we all have said things that were unseemly or that we should not have. Who among us should cast the first stone at her for being human in that regard?

“Yet the lawsuit for which she was being deposed last month was about present-day workplace activities for which Deen bears some responsibility. . . .”

Meanwhile, Andrew Kirell reported for Mediaite Friday that “Deen has lost sponsors and a Food Network career as a result of controversy over her past use of a racial epithet, but her cookbook empire has not suffered the same fate. In the wake of last week’s hubbub, Deen’s book sales and pre-sales have surged, sending her atop an Amazon.com best-seller list. . . . “

CNN plans a special on the N-word Monday hosted by Don Lemon, to air at 7 p.m., 11 p.m. and 2 a.m. Eastern time.

Openly gay CNN anchor Don Lemon treated his viewers to live coverage of a gay “kiss-out” Wednesday and gave them a tour of the Stonewall Inn in New York, considered the birthplace of the gay rights movement. (video)

Gay People “All Over the Airwaves” on Wednesday

“The remarkable shift in how the United States views gay rights and gay people could be easily understood just by following the way the media covered the Supreme Court’s historic rulings on the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8 on Wednesday,” Jack Mirkinson reported Thursday for Huffington Post.

“Just as LGBT people have become ever more visible in American society, so too were they all over the airwaves throughout the day.

“If viewers turned to ABC in the morning, they could see Sam Champion, the openly gay — and married — ‘Good Morning America’ host, talk about how good the ruling felt, and be embraced by his fellow anchors.

“In the evening, they could find Diane Sawyer giving a hero’s welcome to Edith Windsor, the 84-year-old who won the actual case at stake in the DOMA decision. Sawyer called her ‘remarkable.’

“On MSNBC, they would find Rachel Maddow and Thomas Roberts discussing the political and personal implications of the Court’s decision along with another openly gay guest, New York mayoral candidate Christine Quinn.

” ‘Three openly gay people discussing this on national television is itself a moment,’ Maddow said.

“If they switched to CNN, they might have seen Don Lemon, who came out in 2011, gleefully bring his cameras into the iconic Stonewall bar in New York to get some regular peoples’ reaction. ‘If you haven’t been to a gay bar, I’m about to take you to one,’ Lemon said. . . .”

However, there were missteps. “The most common errors I saw in the first day of stories about the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage decisions were these,” Jennifer Vanasco wrote Thursday in Columbia Journalism Review.

“1. Outlets saying that the Defense of Marriage Act had been struck down.

“2. Outlets saying (or implying) that gay marriage was now legal in California . . . .”

In the Los Angeles Times on Tuesday, Paul Taylor and Mark Hugo Lopez of the Pew Research Center noted it would not be as easy as some think to describe the group most affected by the same-sex marriage ruling.

Are they gays? Are they gays and lesbians? Or are they LGBT, an acronym that’s gone mainstream in the last few decades even though — as is often the case with group labels — it’s not fully embraced by everyone it purports to identify . . .,” they wrote.

Voting Rights Challenges Likely Across the Nation

“The Supreme Court’s decision to strike down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, the part determining which states and political subdivisions are subject to the preclearance provision of the law, is likely to spark voting rights challenges around the nation, according to a study by New York University,” George E. Curry wrote Tuesday for the National Newspaper Publishers Association. 

“The 5-4 decision by the conservative majority effectively guts the strongest section of the Voting Rights Act until Congress passes new legislation to meet the objections raised in latest ruling, which grew out of a challenge filed by Shelby County, Ala.

“According to a study by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, the ruling is likely to revive a flood of racially discriminatory practices that had been forbidden by the Department of Justice and federal courts. The Texas attorney general has already announced that the state will immediately implement two voting changes that had been challenged by the Justice Department, including one that requires a voter photo ID, in the wake of the court’s latest ruling. . . .

The decision continued to prompt outrage and sorrow. While some commentators agreed with the court that the Voting Rights Act needs to be updated, others called the decision judicial activism, since Congress had used updated figures and held 20 months of hearings in reauthorizing the act in 2006.

Moreover, drafting laws to enforce the post-Civil War amendments on the right to vote is Congress’ responsibility. Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, noted that in 2006, Congress amassed a 15,000-page record supporting its judgment that minority voters in certain places needed specific protections to be able to participate equally in the political process, Frederick H. Lowe Jr. reported for NorthStar News & Analysis.

Drops in Black Enrollment Follow Affirmative Action Curbs

“Whenever states have eliminated affirmative action in the past, a decline in Black college enrollment has followed that decision, a study by The Civil Rights Project at the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shows,” George E. Curry wrote Tuesday for the National Newspaper Publishers Association.

“Rather than make a definitive ruling on a case involving the University of Texas, on Monday the United States Supreme Court sent the case back to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals with instructions for the judges to determine whether the university met the strict scrutiny standard mandated by [a] previous Supreme Court ruling involving the University of California-Davis Medical School (Bakke) University of Michigan Law School (Grutter). . . .”

The Root, Black America Web Seeking Editors

The Root and blackamericaweb.com, two websites targeting African Americans, are seeking editors.

At the Root, Lauren Williams, acting managing editor, is leaving for Mother Jones’ Washington bureau as a story editor, Mother Jones announced on Thursday. Her departure comes only weeks after Sheryl Salomon stepped down after three years as managing editor, effective June 1, elevating Williams to the acting managing editor position.

Publisher Donna Byrd told Journal-isms, “We will start a search for a new managing editor in a few weeks. In the meantime, everyone on staff is helping to manage the workload.”

Mother Jones said in a news release, “Previously, Williams was the deputy editor for The Root (part of the Washington Post’s Slate Group), where she managed teams of freelancers and staffers and helped spearhead the site’s user experience, search engine optimization, and social-media strategy. Prior to this role, Williams was an editor at AOL’s BlackVoices.com. . . .” Managing Editor Clint Hendler told Journal-isms by telephone that Williams would be developing stories and “managing copy flow out of the D.C. office.”

Blackamericaweb.com, part of Reach Media, closely identified with radio host Tom Joyner, is seeking a managing editor to work in Dallas with Cherie White, director and editor. It is a new position.

The managing editor will “curate content, develop an intern program, extend content on the web originating from our radio shows,” spokesman Marty Raab told Journal-isms by email. Those interested may email jobs (at) reachmediainc.com.

April rankings by the comScore, Inc. research company showed 2,062,000 unique visitors for the Root and 279,000 for blackamericaweb.com.

Kenneth Noble, Former N.Y. Times Writer, Seriously Ill

Kenneth Noble, a former West Africa correspondent and Los Angeles bureau chief for the New York Times, has been diagnosed with terminal heart problems and is being treated in Gainesville, Fla., he told Journal-isms by telephone on Thursday.

Noble, 59, said, “The doctors have decided there is not much they can do for me.” He has had quadruple heart bypass surgery and been diagnosed with congestive heart failure, he said. A New York Times employee for 19 years, Noble taught journalism USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism for eight years after leaving the Times in 2001.

“I have no idea what caused this,” Noble said. “Up until 10 years ago, I was a pretty elite cyclist, a former lifeguard,” and he maintained a vegetarian diet. “I did everything they advise you to do, and it still went bad.”

He added, “I really appreciate the encouragement I’ve gotten in recent months. It’s really kept me going.” Noble can be reached at kubakloth (at) mac.com.

Short Takes

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

Exit mobile version