journal-isms.com

Training Diana W – Bombshell Suit Against “White People” Magazine

richard

Complaint Cites Story Choices, Pale Time Inc. Leadership

A discrimination lawsuit filed by black journalist Tasha Robertson against her former employer, People magazine, is notable because it cites People’s editorial choices and the white makeup of the leadership of the parent company, Time Inc., as evidence of discrimination, Robertson’s lawyer told Journal-isms on Friday.

“Maybe they should call it White People magazine,” Dareh Gregorian wrote in reporting on the suit Wednesday night for the Daily News in New York.

“The recently [laid off] lone black editor of People says she was discriminated against by her boss, and that the popular magazine is biased against African-Americans in general.

“People is ‘a discriminatory organization run entirely by white people who intentionally focus the magazine on stories involving white people and white celebrities,’ Tatsha Robertson’s bombshell lawsuit says.

“The 48-year-old Robertson, ‘the only Black Senior Editor the magazine has ever had,’ was laid off in May, according to the suit.

“She says only five of the mag’s 110 employees were black, and that now-former executive editor Betsy Gleick treated her like a second class-citizen when she came to the magazine from another Time Inc. publication, Essence, in 2010.

” ‘You need to talk like everyone else here. You’re not at Essence anymore,’ Gleick is quoted in the suit as saying. . . .”

David Gottleib, Robertson’s lawyer, told Journal-isms by telephone that he was surprised that Time Inc. did not issue customary denials of the assertions in the lawsuit. Instead, Time has made no comment.

He said it was significant that the suit includes coverage choices as evidence of discrimination.

“The discriminatory environment in which Ms. Robertson was forced to work also permeated the pages of People Magazine,” according to the complaint, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. “Indeed, Ms. Gleick has repeatedly insisted that the only types of stories she and People Magazine were interested in printing were those concerning: ‘White middle-class suburbia.’

“Examples of this openly espoused discriminatory worldview at People Magazine are abundant.

“For instance, in February 2014, Ms. Robertson pitched a story regarding the death of Samira Frasch, an African-American model whose husband was a person of interest in her apparent murder.

“Despite the fact that this story was picked up by a number of media outlets, including CNN, Ms. Gleick responded to Ms. Robertson’s pitch by stating that the victim looked like a ‘slut’ and refused to print the story because the victim was Black, telling Ms. Robertson:

” ‘You know the rule — White suburban women in distress.’

“Tellingly, People Magazine ran an extremely similar story approximately one month later about a White model, Monica Olsen, whose husband reportedly attempted to have her murdered.

“The fact that Ms. Gleick would expressly decline to run a story because the victim was Black, yet run an extremely similar (though arguably even less compelling) story about a White victim, is illustrative of the racial biases condoned at People and which resulted in disparate treatment towards Ms. Robertson.

“By way of another example, People Magazine was at one point looking into a potential story concerning a woman who had been killed by her husband.

“Everyone at People Magazine was interested in the story, including Ms. Gleick, as well as another Top Editor and Executive at People Magazine.

“However, upon viewing a picture of the victim and realizing she was Black, the editor immediately changed his mind.

“The editor sent an email to Ms. Gleick (and copied Ms. Robertson) with a copy of the picture and the statement, in sum and substance, that:

“She’ll never make it into People.’ . . .”

The complaint also says, “All seven of People Magazine’s Top Editors — the level above Ms. Robertson — are White, and People has never had a single Black Top Editor.

“Incredibly, this utter lack of leadership diversity is not limited to People Magazine, but, as shown on Time, Inc.’s own website, every single one of the 11 members of Time, Inc.’s ‘Leadership’ is White. . . . “

In the latest installment of “BrotherSpeak,” a video series that the Washington Post is producing in cooperation with the Maynard Institute for Journalism Education, black men in Ferguson, Mo., express their hurt, anger and hope. (video)

ACLU Says Ferguson Events Brought Setbacks to the Press

“It is not a great time to be a journalist in America,” Noa Yachot, a communications specialist at the American Civil Liberties Union, wrote Thursday for the Huffington Post.

“The assault on the First Amendment by militarized police in Ferguson, Mo., continues unabated, and the press is not spared. Since the start of protests against the August 9 killing of Michael Brown, journalists in Ferguson have been arrested, fired on, threatened, and assaulted.

“After more than a week of heavy-handed police violence — through the use of tactics and weapons better suited for a warzone than an American suburb — freedoms of speech and the press were dealt a major legal blow on Tuesday. A federal court denied a motion from the ACLU of Missouri for an emergency order to prevent police from enforcing a ban on standing in place for more than five seconds. The ‘keep-moving mandate’ (also known as the five-second rule) remains in place, criminalizing constitutionally protected activity and placing a dangerous barrier on the ability of the media to bring us stories from this city under siege. As Tony Rothert, the legal director of the ACLU of Missouri, told MSNBC, ‘In many ways, the First Amendment has been suspended in Ferguson.’

“This defeat came on the heels of an earlier victory, in which the ACLU of Missouri reached an agreement with the police, stating that members of the public and the press can record on-duty police officers. That was good news — except it should never have been up for debate, because you always have the right to photograph what’s plainly visible in public. Including the police.’ . . .”

This Time, the New Yorker’s Cover Is Personal

“ ‘The police shooting of Michael Brown resonates on a personal level with me,’ Eric Drooker says about next week’s cover, which was inspired by images from the scene,” Mina Kaneko and Francoise Mouly wrote Friday about the Sept. 1 issue of the New Yorker.

They also wrote, ” ‘An artist friend of mine was killed by a cop in lower Manhattan, back in 1991. He happened to be black, and the police officer was never indicted.’ Drooker continues, ‘As a resident of Manhattan’s Lower East Side, I witnessed the blurring distinctions between the police and military during the Tompkins Square riots of the eighties. I’ll never forget the day the N.Y.P.D. showed up in a military tank to evict nonviolent squatter friends from buildings on Avenue B and Thirteenth Street, where I grew up. This incident triggered a vivid childhood memory of the police driving a similar armored tank on East Fourteenth street, in 1968, to quell possible ‘disturbances’ after Martin Luther King was assassinated.

“ ‘Of course, rubber bullets, tear gas, and Tasers have been used for a while — on nonviolent anti-war protests at the dawn of the Iraq invasion, not to mention Occupy — but the U.S. media has often chosen to ignore these images. Now that billions have been spent and the equipment is in place throughout the country, the intensive militarization of America’s police forces is finally being acknowledged after the horrors of Ferguson.’ ”

White House Said to Rely on Sharpton for Ferguson Info

“Politico Magazine writes the Obama administration leaned on MSNBC’s Al Sharpton for information after the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown and subsequent protests in Ferguson, Missouri,” Jordan Chariton reported Friday for TVNewser.

Glenn Thrush began his 2,700-word piece for Politico Magazine:

“A few days after 18-year-old Mike Brown was gunned down in Ferguson, Missouri, White House officials enlisted an unusual source for on-the-ground intelligence amid the chaos and tear gas: the Rev. Al Sharpton, a fiery activist who became a household name by provoking rather than pacifying.

“Sharpton — once such a pariah that Clinton administration officials rushed through their ribbon-cuttings in Harlem for fear he’d show up and force them to, gasp, shake his hand — arrived on the scene 72 hours after the shooting at the request of Brown’s grandfather, who had admired his advocacy on behalf of the family of slain Florida teen Trayvon Martin.

“But if the old Al Sharpton would have parachuted into Ferguson to rile up the masses, the Obama-era Al Sharpton trod a more gingerly path to justice. Over the years, the 59-year-old former Brooklyn protest leader turned MSNBC talk-show host has embraced a new identity, one that reflects his evolution from agitator to insider with all that implies. In Ferguson, Sharpton established himself as a de facto contact and conduit for a jittery White House seeking to negotiate a middle ground between meddling and disengagement. ‘here’s a trust factor with The Rev from the Oval Office on down,’ a White House official familiar with their dealings told me. ‘He gets it, and he’s got credibility in the community that nobody else has got. There’s really no one else out there who does what he does.’

“And the White House, as the crisis following Brown’s death seemed to flare out of control, worked extensively behind the scenes to maximize The Rev’s doing what he does, using him as both a source of information and a go-between. After huddling with Brown’s family and local community leaders, Sharpton connected directly with White House adviser and First Friend Valerie Jarrett, vacationing in her condo in the exclusive Oak Bluffs section of Martha’s Vineyard, not far from where President Obama and his family were staying. Obama was ‘horrified’ by the images he was seeing on TV, Jarrett told Sharpton, and proceeded to pepper him with questions as she collected information for the president: How bad was the violence? Was it being fueled by outside groups — and could Sharpton do anything to talk them down? What did the Brown family want the White House to do? . . .“

 

Politico Hires Eva Rodriguez, a Latina, as Senior Editor

“Editorial writer Eva Rodríguez has left the Washington Post to become Senior Editor at Politico magazine, Veronica Villafañe reported Thursday for her Media Moves site. “She had been at the Post for the last 7 years in several roles.

“Her first day on the new job was this past Monday, August 18. . . .”

News of Rodriguez’s hire comes as Politico is under increasing scrutiny for its scant diversity. ” Considering that Politico has produced over 2,7000 stories about Latinos and that the U.S. Latino vote continues to be a newsworthy topic during election cycles . . . the site’s Latino staffing record is dismal,” Julio Ricardo Varela wrote Monday for his Latino Rebels site. “No executives. No Latino political journalists who fall under the ‘star system’ category . . . .:

Valera was following up on a piece by Tracie Powell of alldigitocracy.com Sunday that reported that diversity at the print-and-digital site was “worse than it was two years ago in that the number of black journalists working at Politico has dropped by half.”

Editor-in-chief John F. Harris signaled Tuesday that he would respond to Journal-isms on the criticism but did not.

Washington Post Editorial Board Won’t Use “Redskins” Term

“The Washington Post editorial board said Friday it will stop using the word ‘Redskins’ when referring to Washington’s football team, joining a growing list of other commentators who have renounced the term because they believe it disparages Native Americans,” Annys Shin and Liz Clarke reported Friday for the Post.

“In a statement, the board said, ‘While we wait for the NFL to catch up with thoughtful opinion and common decency we have decided not to use the slur ourselves except when it is essential for clarity or effect.’

“The editorial board is separate from the news-gathering side of the organization, which executive editor Marty Baron said will continue to use the team’s moniker.

“ ‘The Post’s newsroom and the editorial page operate independently of each other,’ Baron said. ‘Standard operating policy in the newsroom has been to use the names that established institutions choose for themselves. That remains our policy, as we continue to vigorously cover controversy over the team’s name and avoid any advocacy role on this subject.’ . . .

The Post editorial said, “We were impressed this week by the quiet integrity of Mike Carey, who recently retired after 19 seasons as one of the NFL’s most respected referees. As recounted by Post columnist Mike Wise, Mr. Carey asked the league not to assign him to officiate any Washington games and, since 2006, the league granted his request. He never made any announcement about it. “It just became clear to me that to be in the middle of the field, where something disrespectful is happening, was probably not the best thing for me,” Mr. Carey said.”

Sportswriter Dave McKenna contended on “The Kojo Nnamdi Show” this month that the Post and other organizations “won’t use racially-charged words or gender slurs in their articles. They’ll use asterisks or something. And like a band that I liked as a younger man, The Dead Kennedys. When The Dead Kennedys came out they would not call them in reviews. They would call them The DKs. And so there is precedent for them.

McKenna told Journal-isms Friday by email, “i never talked to anybody at the paper about it and have no idea what the background is, but if you go through the archives and search for ‘jello biafra’ -‘kennedys’ you’ll find the review where this up and coming punk band was called the DKs. ‘dead kennedys’ doesnt show up anywhere. (i did this a few weeks ago just to make sure i wasn’t senile! and it’s still there!)”

However, McKenna conceded, “the Post started using ‘dead kennedys’ as the band grew for sure.”

 

Short Takes

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

Exit mobile version