Site icon journal-isms.com

News Outlets Want Eric Garner Documents

“You Still Have to Beg for Facts in This Country”

Reader Comments Demonize Black Bikers, Praise Whites

Claudia Puig, USA Today Film Critic, Takes Buyout

Photographer’s Passion Makes Every Day Memorial Day

Website Picks Its “50 Sexiest in National TV News”


Editorial Page Editor: If This Is Liberal Agenda, So Be It


Asian Americans Urged to Reject “Model Minority” Hype


Angola Drops Defamation Charges Against Muckraker


Short Takes

“You Still Have to Beg for Facts in This Country”

“Though it may seem that the #blacklivesmatter marches have thinned to a trickle in recent months, there are still a number of uncertainties — OK, all the uncertainties — about how the investigation into to Eric Garner’s ‘chokehold’ death turned up nothing in the way of punishment for the police who were somehow proven not to have executed him,” Billy Manes wrote Wednesday for the Orlando Weekly.

“Yesterday, the association that this paper belongs to, the Association of Alternative Newsmedia, joined in an amicus brief to urge the courts to release the documents that led a grand jury to turn a blind eye. Anything goes on Staten Island, apparently.

“Immediately below is the announcement from AAN’s Kevin M. Goldberg, and beneath that you can see the court filing and a list of those behind it. You still have to beg for facts in this country, especially if you are in the media.”

In all, about 30 journalism organizations joined the brief. They include the Radio Television Digital News Association, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the American Society of News Editors, the Center for Investigative Reporting, the National Press Photographers Association and the Society of Professional Journalists.

Also, Advance Publications, Inc.; Bloomberg L.P.; BuzzFeed; Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN); the Center for Investigative Reporting; Courthouse News Service; Daily News, LP; Dow Jones & Company, Inc.; First Amendment Coalition; First Look Media, Inc.

Also, Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University; the McClatchy Co.; MediaNews Group, Inc.; the National Press Club; the New York Times Co.; News 12; Newsday LLC; North Jersey Media Group Inc.; NYP Holdings, Inc.; Online News Association; Reuters America LLC; the Seattle Times Co.; Tully Center for Free Speech; and the Washington Post.

Manes continued, “Among many high profile incidents of police use of force is the death of Eric Garner on Staten Island last summer after he was put in a police chokehold. A grand jury was convened to decide whether to bring the officers involved to trial but the grand jury declined to indict. Several groups petitioned a New York trial court for access to these grand jury materials, including the New York Post, NYCLU [New York Civil Liberties Union], NAACP, the city’s public advocate, and the Legal Aid Society.

“As one might expect, the petition was denied. All but the New York Post have now filed an appeal of that decision. Because the Post decided not to join the appeal, there is no media party involved in the case at this point, which led to the decision by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press to draft an amicus brief that was filed on behalf of almost 30 media companies and organizations, including AAN.

“The brief makes three arguments in favor of access. First, disclosure of these materials will serve the public interest. There have been several racially charged incidents in the past year in which unarmed individuals have died at the hands of police officers. The public, while it doesn’t need to second guess the ultimate decision, should have the opportunity to understand how the case was presented to the grand jury.

“Disclosure to the public and the press will serve several purposes, including eliminating confusion and misinformation about the underlying events and the grand jury process, scrutinizing the behavior of the prosecutor (who is now a Member of Congress); informing ongoing discussions surrounding police reforms and reassuring the public that the court system is not concealing unpleasant truths under a veil of secrecy at the expense of the public interest.

“The first section of the brief discusses the many cases where press and public access to court proceedings have provided these benefits.

“The second argument is that all of the above is true, to some extent, even where grand juries are involved. The proceedings of grand juries, while generally conducted in secret, are not absolutely secret; in many instances, including Ferguson, MO, prosecutors have chosen to proactively release grand jury information in order to benefit the public.

“The traditional reasons for grand jury secrecy don’t apply here. The investigation of this case is over. There has been no indictment and there is no concern that the defendant might flee. Nor is there likely to be harassment or threats of violence against witnesses, as no further grand jury proceedings are to be convened. Finally, the often-cited reason of assuring grand jury witnesses that their testimony will remain secret is a fallacy. There is no guarantee of secrecy, as records can often be released at various times; in fact certain statutes require release of grand jury testimony in certain situations.

“Finally, we argue that access to these records does not have to be ‘all or nothing.’ The court can review testimony and decide on a witness by witness, or even line by line basis, whether to release testimony while withholding particularly sensitive testimony. By the same vein, certain testimony carries more public interest than others. For instance, while the public has seen two videos involving the fatal chokehold applied to Mr. Garner, two others apparently were shown to the grand jury but never made public. They should be. . . .”

The story included a link to the amicus brief.

“Black Bike Week” takes place this weekend in Myrtle Beach, S.C. (video)

Reader Comments Demonize Black Bikers, Praise Whites

“In his column this week, Charles Blow of The New York Times broke down the difference between ‘bikers’ and ‘thugs’ in the wake of the deadly biker gang shootout in Waco, Texas,Gene Demby wrote Friday for NPR’s “Code Switch.”

” ‘The words ‘outlaw’ and ‘biker,’ while pejorative to some, still evoke a certain romanticism in the American ethos. They conjure an image of individualism, adventure and virility. There’s an endless list of motorcycle gang movies. A search for ‘motorcycle romance’ on Amazon yields thousands of options. Viagra, the erectile dysfunction drug, even has a motorcycle commercial.

” ‘While ‘thug life’ has also been glamorized in movies, music and books, its scope is limited and racialized. It is applied to — and even adopted by — black men. And the evocation is more “Menace II Society” than “Easy Rider.” The pejorative is unambiguous.’

“It turns out that a version of this dynamic plays out every summer in South Carolina’s Myrtle Beach area, where two different festivals for motorcycle enthusiasts are held each May — one white, one black.

“The first is the Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Rally, which regularly draws about a half-million people. Its attendees are mostly white. The other is the smaller Memorial Day BikeFest, which is mostly black and informally known as ‘Black Bike Week.’

Jason Eastman, a sociologist at Coastal Carolina University, has studied how residents of the Myrtle Beach area, around 70 percent of whom were white at the time of his research, feel about these two events. In a paper published last month in Contemporary Justice Review, he analyzed 8,600 comments left by readers on online articles in the Myrtle Beach Sun News about the Harley rally and the Black Bike Week held in 2009, and about controversial new rules the city had placed on the events — mandatory helmets, no loud mufflers — that year.

“Eastman found that while the black bikers were painted as ‘underclass criminals who attend the rally to steal and murder,’ the white bikers were framed as ‘exemplars of American Individualism,’ whose disregard of the new rules was ‘celebrated as defiant acts against authority.’ . . .”

Claudia Puig, USA Today Film Critic, Takes Buyout

Film critic Claudia Puig has left USA Today after a 15-year run,” Veronica Villafañe reported Wednesday for her Media Moves site.

“She was one of 55 employees to take a buyout in the latest round of staff cuts at the paper. Her last day was Friday, May 15.

“As she put it in a tweet, she’s ‘moving on 2 explore other adventures.’

“Claudia says she will continue to ‘regularly discuss movies on public radio and video and will continue to watch, think, dream and, most of all, love movies.’ . . .”

According to a bio, “Claudia has been a film critic at USA Today since 2001, becoming lead film critic in 2006, and is also a regular contributor for National Public Radio’s Film Week. She has discussed movies on NBC, CBS, CNN and on Mitch Albom’s syndicated radio show and radio programs in Boston and Washington DC.

“She was named Entertainment Journalist of the Year in 2009 by the Publicists Guild. Claudia began her journalism career at the Los Angeles Times covering city government, crime and courts and was part of the team that won a Pulitzer for its coverage of the L.A. Riots in 1991. In 1993 she began covering the movie business at the LA Times.”

Photographer’s Passion Makes Every Day Memorial Day

Over time, so many things lose their meaning,” David Gonzalez reported Friday for the “Lens” blog of the New York Times.

“The sting of death, the heartbreak of loss, which loomed so large in the national consciousness after the Civil War, spurred ceremonies that led to Memorial Day. The horrific carnage of World War I — the war to end all wars — led to commemorating military sacrifice from all conflicts. But today, Memorial Day, like other holidays, has been reduced largely to a day for sales, sleeping in or going out.

“That irked Andrew Lichtenstein.

“He had been searching through an old hard drive when he came across images he had made of military funerals, some of which did not make it into ‘Never Coming Home,’ a book he published on the topic.”

Gonzalez also wrote, “Mr. Lichtenstein began wondering what he could do as a photographer once the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. The war itself unsettled him, someone who had photographed the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center, watching as people leapt to their deaths. He thought the stories about the rapid, decisive sweep into Iraq rang hollow. . . .

“An item he saw in the paper about the funeral for a soldier from Long Island led him to attend the service, which was short, precise and quite moving. Then and there, he decided this was the story he wanted to tell. From 2003 until 2006, he attended some 60 such funerals around the country, getting information from the Department of Defense website. . . .”

Website Picks Its “50 Sexiest in National TV News”

The staff of Mediaite on Thursday chose its “50 sexiest in national TV news.”

While this is certainly a list of physically beautiful people, remember, being sexy isn’t only about looks, Mediaite said. “It’s also about how they cover the news and in many cases, having something to say and not being afraid to say it.”

Journalists and commentators of color on the list include Alex Wagner, Alicia Mendez, Betty Liu, Carl Quintanilla, Don Lemon, Gio Benitez, Harris Faulkner, Jorge Ramos, Jose Diaz-Balart, Marc Lamont Hill, Natalie Morales, Richard Lui, Robin Roberts, Susan Li, Tamron Hall, T.J. Holmes, Van Jones and Zain Asher.

Editorial Page Editor: If This Is Liberal Agenda, So Be It

I wrote a light blogpost last month about Mayor Dan Clodfelter proclaiming April 30 ‘Honesty Day’ in Charlotte,” Taylor Batten, editorial page editor of the Charlotte (N.C.) Observer, wrote for last Sunday’s print edition. “Honesty Day, it turned out, is observed on that date nationwide.

“I noted a Wikipedia explanation of what it’s all about: ‘On this day, anyone participating may ask any question they choose and the opposing person should give a truthful and straightforward answer.’

“I invited readers to say what they would ask, and of whom.

David Fry of Charlotte was among those who responded.

“ ‘To: observer editors

“ ‘Question? Why do you support such a liberal agenda?

“ ‘Remember you’re supposed to answer honestly.’ ”

“Well, rules are rules, so I suppose you deserve an honest answer for Honesty Day. Here goes:

“We believe that everyone is created equal.

“We believe that children should not bear responsibility for the sins of their parents.

“We believe that prevention is a heck of a lot cheaper than a cure.

“We believe people should not be treated as lesser citizens, with fewer rights, because of whom they love.

“We believe a thriving city, state and nation rests to a great degree in the quality of its public schools, and that every child deserves a dedicated, dynamic teacher, regardless of what ZIP code that child lives in.

“We believe discrimination is wrong in every instance.

“We believe in consistency, so if you are going to drug-test recipients of public assistance, drug-test them all, including the corporate chieftains who are the biggest beneficiaries.

“We believe that police officers should act professionally, under incredibly difficult circumstances, regardless of a suspect’s race. . . .”

Among the additional beliefs: “We believe there are peace-loving Muslims” and “We do not believe President Obama was born in Kenya.”

Angola Drops Defamation Charges Against Muckraker

In a surprise development, the defamation charges against journalist Rafael Marques de Morais were dropped Thursday by the Angolan military generals who had brought them,” Kerry A. Dolan wrote Thursday for Forbes.

“Marques had been charged with criminal defamation for writing about human rights abuses in Angola’s diamond mining region. He alleged that the murders and torture there had been orchestrated by private security and mining companies owned by Angolan generals. Marques could possibly have faced up to nine years in jail if he had been found guilty. . . .”

Dolan also wrote, “Marques cautioned that the trial proceedings are not officially over. The trial will continue with oral submissions on Monday May 25 and the judge will read the sentence on Thursday May 28.

“Marques, a longtime investigative journalist who has highlighted abuses in his country, had widespread and ongoing support from a broad range of human rights and free speech groups, some of which had expected the court to wrongly convict Marques. So the news came as a positive surprise. . . .”

Short Takes

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

Exit mobile version