Maynard Institute archives

Asian Immigrants to Outpace Blacks, Latinos

by richard0523

Unexpectedly, 1965 Law Would Change the Face of America

Online News Association Honors Dori Maynard

Despite Accolades, Pope’s Visit Left Indian Unsatisfied

N.Y. Daily News Cuts Could Mean End of Tabloid Era

Optics of Trump’s Ouster of Ramos Weren’t All Accidental

The Nation Publishes “The Case Against the Roberts Court”

Radio One Invests in Casino to Reverse Millions in Losses

Giago Still Argues for “Indian” Over “Native American”

Cecilia Vaisman Dies at 54, “Such a Radio Genius”

Short Takes

Unexpectedly, 1965 Law Would Change the Face of America

Asian immigrants are projected to become the largest immigrant group by 2055 and make up 38 percent of the foreign-born population by 2065, the Pew Research Center reported on Monday, although Hispanics will remain a larger share of the nation’s overall population.

The report was timed to commemorate a milestone. “Fifty years ago this week, after taking a curious route to the president’s desk, one of the most underestimated bills in U.S. history was signed into law,” Tom Gjelten, a correspondent for NPR News, and the author of “A Nation of Nations: A Great American Immigration Story,” wrote Monday for the Washington Post.

“The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) would end up changing the face of the United States as much as any measure enacted in the 20th century. But that was largely because of a miscalculation by a congressman who thought he was limiting the bill’s effect,” Gjelten wrote.

Wayne Dawkins noted Sunday in the Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk, Va., “From 1924 to 1965, Northern Europeans — Anglo-Saxon or Nordic — were welcome. Mediterranean and Slavic Europeans were grudgingly accepted. Asians were virtually banned. Africans were not included in the conversation.

“Mexicans and Caribbean people of the Western Hemisphere were accepted as temporary labor to be recruited, then sent home as the U.S. economy soared and dipped. . . . “

The Pew Research Center said its projections “also show that black immigrants and white immigrants together will become a slightly larger share of the nation’s immigrants by 2065 than in 2015 (29% vs. 26%).

“The country’s overall population will feel the impact of these shifts. Non-Hispanic whites are projected to become less than half of the U.S. population by 2055 and 46% by 2065. No racial or ethnic group will constitute a majority of the U.S. population. Meanwhile, Hispanics will see their population share rise to 24% by 2065 from 18% today, while Asians will see their share rise to 14% by 2065 from 6% today. . . .”

Paul Cheung, national president of the Asian American Journalists Association, told Journal-isms by email Monday that the conclusions about Asian immigrants were not surprising.

“Asian American Pacific Islanders represent the fastest growing minority group in America. We, the media, have the opportunity to grow alongside this audience by creating an inclusive environment of diverse coverage and hiring practices. Otherwise, we will risk losing this growing audience if we fail to represent their voice and experience,” Cheung said.

Pew also reported, “For its part, the American public has mixed views on the impact immigrants have had on American society. . . . Overall, 45% of Americans say immigrants in the U.S. are making American society better in the long run, while 37% say they are making it worse (16% say immigrants are not having much effect). The same survey finds that half of Americans want to see immigration to the U.S. reduced (49%), and eight-in-ten (82%) say the U.S. immigration system either needs major changes or it needs to be completely rebuilt. . . .”

“Views are most negative about the economy and crime: Half of U.S. adults say immigrants are making things worse in those areas. On the economy, 28% say immigrants are making things better, while 20% say they are not having much of an effect. On crime, by contrast, just 7% say immigrants are making things better, while 41% generally see no positive or negative impact of immigrants in the U.S. on crime.

The researchers continued, “Some 47% of U.S. adults say immigrants from Asia have had a mostly positive impact on American society, and 44% say the same about immigrants from Europe. Meanwhile, half of Americans say the impact of immigrants from Africa has been neither positive nor negative.

“However, Americans are more likely to hold negative views about the impact of immigrants from Latin America and the Middle East. . . .”

Evelyn Hsu, executive director of the Maynard Institute, accepts an award for that Dori J. Maynard at the Online News Association conference Saturday in Los Angeles. From left are Sara-Ann Rosen, Dori Maynard’s sister; brother David Maynard; mother Liz Rosen; brother Alex Maynard and Hsu. (credit: ONA) (video)

Online News Association Honors Dori Maynard

Dori J. Maynard, the late president of the Maynard Institute for Journalism Education who was described as “the legend who succeeded a legend,” was awarded the Rich Jaroslovsky Founder Award Saturday at the Online News Association convention in Los Angeles.

The award was accepted by Evelyn Hsu, executive director of the Maynard Institute, and Liz Rosen, Dori Maynard’s mother, as her brothers Alex and David Maynard, and sister, Sara-Ann Rosen, looked on.

Jaroslovsy presented the award to the daughter of Robert C. Maynard as a “tireless and powerful” diversity advocate who was “the conscience of online journalism.” A supporter of ONA, she “embraced digital media,” Jaroslovsy said.

Hsu said the Institute was continuing Dori Maynard’s work with the help of the John S. and James L. Knight, Ford and W.K. Kellogg foundations as it develops a strategic plan to “reimagine our work in this new environment.”

Ironically, the diverse contingent of Maynard associates was just about the only racial diversity on stage during the awards program.

This, despite the fact that “ONA15 speakers include 52 percent women, 36 percent people of color, 25 percent local news and eight percent international representation,” according to ONA officials Irving Washington and Jane McDonnell, who wrote of ONA’s diversity plans on the association’s website on Sept. 13.

Meanwhile, the Maynard Institute announced that Martin G. Reynolds, Bay Area News Group senior editor, is receiving a 12-month fellowship “to lead the institute through a strategic planning and implementation process,” and added three members to its board of directors.

They are Debra Adams Simmons, vice president of news development at Advance Local and a 2016 Nieman Foundation fellow; Dickson Louie, principal, Louie & Associates, CPA, and visiting assistant professor at the University of California, Davis, Graduate School of Management; and Kevin Merida, managing editor, Washington Post.

Vandals defaced a statue of Junipero Serra at the Carmel Mission in Carmel, Calif., where the remains of the recently canonized missionary are buried. (Credit: Fox News) (video)

Despite Accolades, Pope’s Visit Left Indian Unsatisfied

“During his address to the U.S. Congress on September 24, Pope Francis alluded to the collision between the colonizing nations of Christendom and our original nations and peoples of this continent,” Steven Newcomb (Shawnee, Lenape) wrote Saturday for Indian Country Today Media Network.

“In a classic example of a bureaucratic side-step, the pope said: ‘Tragically, the rights of those who were here long before us were not always respected.’ Is this meant to suggest that the rights of our ancestors and our nations were mostly respected, just not always respected? History provides ample evidence that the right of our nations to live free from domination and dehumanization has hardly ever been respected by dominating societies, such as the United States.

“Pope Francis also said: ‘Those first contacts were often turbulent and violent, but it is difficult to judge the past by the criteria of the present.’ With regard to U.S. federal Indian law and policy, the pontiff made two errors of logic with that one simple statement. The issues we’re dealing with regarding the doctrine of Christian discovery and domination are not ‘in the past.’ The doctrine of Christian domination has been carried forward and maintained by each new generation of the society. It is still being maintained in 2015. . . .”

N.Y. Daily News Cuts Could Mean End of Tabloid Era

“When it was over and the feature page was gone, dozens of reporters had been fired and the morning assignment editor was shown the door only minutes after handing out the morning’s first assignments, The Daily News — or what was left of it — was in a state of shock,” Alan Feuer wrote Sunday for the New York Times.

Feuer also wrote, “At the very least the job cuts meant that the recent attrition at newspapers across the country had finally arrived in force in the nation’s media capital. But it also suggested something deeper — about the city and the industry. Mortimer B. Zuckerman, the owner of The News, known for its crusades against municipal misconduct, was dismissing ace reporters while bolstering his global online platform.

“William D. Holiber, the chief executive, had also created a satellite operation, in New Jersey, with a mission in part to aggregate content from across the web and repackage it for The News’s own site.

“While both men promised that The Daily News would not give up its city-centric mandate, the shift toward a digital edition, which would read the same in Brooklyn and Bahrain, was the end of something. The News, after all, is the ultimate local paper, and the real-life model for Clark Kent’s Daily Planet. If focusing on the Internet was not the end of the tabloid itself, then perhaps it was the end of the city’s tabloid era. . . .”

Donald Trump, at lectern, tells Jorge Ramos, standing, to sit at an August news conference in Dubuque, Iowa. (credit: ABC News) (video)

Optics of Trump’s Ouster of Ramos Weren’t All Accidental

“Most non-Spanish-speaking Americans probably know [Jorge] Ramos best as the journalist who was thrown out of Donald Trump’s press conference in Dubuque, Iowa, in August,” Marcela Valdes wrote Friday for Sunday’s New York Times Magazine in one of two profiles of the Univision anchor appearing in the past few days.

“Ramos had tried to ask Trump — who had recently declared that ‘anchor babies’ were not American citizens and that he would deport 11 million undocumented immigrants — about his immigration proposals. Trump told Ramos to sit down; Ramos refused. ‘I have the right to ask a question,’ he said. Trump shot back, ‘Go back to Univision,’ before signaling for a guard to remove Ramos from the room.

“It was a remarkable exchange, and the optics of it weren’t entirely accidental. Ramos arrived almost two hours early to grab a seat in the front row while his team set up two cameras: one to film Trump and one to film Ramos. Even before Trump entered the room, Ramos knew he would stand up when he asked his question. He’d studied Trump, he told me, and noticed that it was easier for Trump to silence reporters when they were sitting down. He also wanted to be equal to Trump, visually, and to be miked separately so that, for his audiences at least, his voice would be as loud as Trump’s.

“When I suggested that such preparations turned the news into a kind of contrived performance, Ramos countered that performance was very different from acting. Television news, he argued, can’t be wholly improvised. Flights need to be booked. Press passes must be requested and approved. ‘TV doesn’t happen,’ he said. ‘You produce TV.’ And if the cameras are not rolling, there is no story.

“To prove his point, he cited the case of The Des Moines Register, the Iowa newspaper that was denied press credentials for at least one Trump campaign event after it published an editorial titled ‘Trump Should Pull the Plug on His Bloviating Side Show.’ ‘What’s more important?’ Ramos asked me: the ejection of one reporter or the exclusion of an entire newspaper? Yet for the average television viewer, The Des Moines Register incident might as well never have happened. It occurred off-camera. . . .”

The Nation Publishes “The Case Against the Roberts Court”

“Tuesday, September 29, marks the tenth anniversary of John Roberts’ appointment as Chief Justice of the United States,” the Nation magazine announced on Monday. “In anticipation, The Nation is publishing ‘The Case Against The Roberts Court: A Decade of Justice Undone,’ a special issue in collaboration with the Alliance for Justice (AFJ).”

The magazine said that it brought together 10 “of the foremost legal scholars, commentators, and practitioners in the US,” and that “the collection offers a chronological assessment of the most consequential and controversial conservative decisions — one per year — issued by the Court. . . .”

One of three areas examined is “An abiding suspicion of race-conscious efforts to ameliorate discrimination:

  • “Paul Butler reviews how the Court granted police officers extraordinary, unconstitutional power by rendering the ‘exclusionary rule’ toothless;
  • “William Yeomans explores how it stymied public school integration in a reversal of decades of equal-protection law;
  • “Theodore M. Shaw reports on the gutting of the Voting Rights Act;
  • “George H. Kendall questions whether the death penalty is even constitutional. . . .”

Giago Still Argues for “Indian” Over “Native American”

Tim Giago

Tim Giago, editor emeritus of Native Sun News and founding president of the Native American Journalists Association, has long argued for use of the term “American Indian” over “Native American.” He returned to the subject in the Sept. 23 edition of Native Sun News.

“The choice of ‘Native American’ came into vogue in the late 1970s because there were those who objected to the word ‘Indian’ never knowing that ‘Indian’ was the Spanish version of ‘Indios’[,] a name some would translate to mean a shortened version of ‘Niño’s de Indios’ or ‘Children of God.’ As the name traveled north it slowly went from Indios to Indian and no, Columbus was not so stupid that he thought he landed in India or the West Indies. . . .”

Giago also wrote, “In this world of political correctness, it is a shame that the identity of a people who have always called themselves Indians are now left in a state of confused identities. Enos Poor Bear, former president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe, said many years ago, ‘I was born an Indian and I will die an Indian.’

“If the mainstream media wants to change our identity they should at least consult with the thousands of Indian elders who still call themselves ‘Indians.’ And in the meantime Indian newspapers and radio stations should take the advice we just offered and ask their own tribal elders what name they prefer to be called. We are probably engaged in a losing battle because the national media has far more influence that we do, but at least in most cases we will used the term ‘Indian’ when we feel it is appropriate. . . .”

Cecilia Vaisman Dies at 54, “Such a Radio Genius”

“Award-winning journalist and multimedia producer Cecilia Vaisman, who brought the pressing issues of her native Latin America to the forefront of radio audiences in the United States through her passionate style of storytelling [accessible via search engine], died Sunday after a battle with breast cancer, according to her colleagues,” Tony Briscoe reported Sunday for the Chicago Tribune. “She was 54.

“Vaisman, who earned two Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Awards for reporting on the disadvantaged, among numerous other commendations, had her radio documentaries broadcast on WBEZ’s ‘This American Life,’ National Public Radio’s ‘All Things Considered’ and ‘Latino USA,’ and other outlets.

” ‘She was such a radio genius,’ said Alan Weisman, co-founder of Homelands Productions, an independent media cooperative. ‘She was not only a good reporter working for radio, but her work was very richly produced. It was like setting news to music with lots of sound interwoven. She was a master at that.’

“Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and raised in northern New Jersey, Vaisman was the youngest of four children. She earned a degree in Latin American studies from Barnard College in New York City and later joined the staff of NPR in Washington as a producer in 1986. . . .”

Short Takes

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

Related posts

Victorious Zimmerman Team Blasts Media

richard

Tavis Smiley vs. NPR

richard

U.S. Ethics, Cuban Journalists

richard

Leave a Comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.