Site icon journal-isms.com

Increasingly, More Put Their Trust in Gossip

richard

Social Media Gains With Blacks, Young Adults
. . . For Blacks, Climate Tops Border as Policy Issue
205 Small Newsrooms to Split $20 Million
Perceptions Trump Facts on ‘Better Off’ Question

Harris Appearance on Fox Yields High Ratings
Writers Urge Caution in Linking Others with Diddy
Safety Nets Fail Surviving Victims of Gun Violence
RTDNA Spotlights Banking Bias Against Indigenous
Urgent Pleas Seek Aid for Journalists Hit by Israel
Cuba Cracks Down, Then a Massive Power Blackout

Short Takes: Ta-Nehisi Coates, CBS and Tony Dokoupil; Howard University’s Cathy Hughes School of Communications; Sputnik radio stations in U.S.; Mel Showers; Tammy Robinson; recognizing “the largest known domestic slave sale in United States history”; 1930s deportation of Mexican-Americans; Derrick Z. Jackson, Candace Dantes and Outdoor Writers Association of America;

Edward R. Murrow Awards; Scripps Howard Journalism Awards; Fox Soul’s “Truth Talks”; advice on covering Native communities; layoffs at Global Press; Iranian-American journalist held in Evin prison; Latin American laws targeting civil society, journalists; Venezuela cancels journalists’ passports; displaced journalists in DRC continue to report; Chinese news agency on negative Africa coverage; Nigerian journalists escape death by whiskers; Tanzanian newspapers suspended; gender disparity in Sudanese media institutions

Homepage photo: From “5 ways to spot disinformation on your social media feeds” Credit: ABC News

Support Journal-isms

Donations are tax-deductible.

Social Media Gains With Blacks, Young Adults

“Americans continue to register record-low trust in the mass media, with 31% expressing a ‘great deal’ or ‘fair amount’ of confidence in the media to report the news ‘fully, accurately and fairly,’ similar to last year’s 32%,” Megan Brenan reported Oct. 14 for the Gallup organization.

The results come as trust in social media is rising, especially among African Americans and younger adults, at the same time that disinformation and misinformation are spreading, often unchecked, in this election year.

At a Journal-isms Roundtable in January on creeping authoritarianism, Charles Whitaker, dean of the Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, said, “We did a survey of Chicago area students aged 15 to 20 and found that over 70 percent of them said they do not watch any form or consume any form of news.

“Their news diet has a very well-worn pattern of TikTok videos and things that are not necessarily related to civics and the functioning of the democracy.” Journalists should be asking, “How does one get through?” the dean said.

Earlier this month, PEN America brought together top journalists and experts to discuss the serious dangers of disinformation in the final weeks before Election Day. Among the trends that worried them most is the decline of content moderation online.

“The thing that keeps me up at night is that we’ll continue to see a race to the bottom by social media platforms in terms of responding to this issue,” said Samuel Woolley, University of Pittsburgh professor, disinformation researcher and author. “We were seeing a lot of action in the space, then suddenly, we’ve been seeing a lot of inaction and actually willful negligence, led by some folks that I’m sure I don’t need to mention.”

Gallup reported that “Americans’ trust in the media — such as newspapers, television and radio — first fell to 32% in 2016 and did so again last year.

“For the third consecutive year, more U.S. adults have no trust at all in the media (36%) than trust it a great deal or fair amount. Another 33% of Americans express ‘not very much’ confidence. . . . Local and state governments and the American people as a whole are the only entities garnering trust from more than half of U.S. adults.”

Separately, the Pew Research Center zeroed in on young adults. “Across most age groups, Americans remain far less likely to trust information from social media sites than from national and local news organizations. But the youngest adults are an exception, it reported Thursday.

“Adults under 30 are now nearly as likely to have a lot of or some trust in the information that comes from social media sites (52%) as from national news organizations (56%). More young adults (71%) express trust in information from local news outlets.”

By race, Blacks were more likely than whites to trust social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter.

Asked whether they trusted national news organizations a lot or somewhat, 57 percent of whites said yes, as did 65 percent of Blacks.

For local news organizataions, figures for both whites and Blacks stood at 75 percent.

However, for social media, the results on trust were 32 percent of whites and 47 percent of Blacks.

Figures for the news organizations have steadily decreased, while trust in social media has risen.

For whites and Blacks, the figure for national news organizations was 76 percent in 2016; and 81 percent for both groups then.

For social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, the figure in 2016, based on social media web users, was 31 percent for whites and 43 percent for Blacks.

Africa has some of the poorest and hottest countries in the world. This means that young African children are at particular risk of heat-stress impacts.(Credit: Riccardo Mayer/Shutterstock)

. . . For Blacks, Climate Tops Border as Policy Issue

A survey by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace shows that “Black voters (48 percent) ranked climate change as their top foreign policy concern, while Hispanic (51 percent) and White (52 percent) respondents prioritized immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border,” reports Carnegie’s Christopher Shell.

The survey, taken in late August and published Oct. 11, also showed, “On the two top domestic concerns, undecided Black respondents felt [Vice President Kamala] Harris could do a better job on the economy (38 percent versus 20 percent)” for former president Donald Trump. “However, opinions were more divided on who could handle inflation,” with 22 percent favoring Harris and 21 percent favoring Trump.

“In terms of foreign policy, undecided Black voters preferred Harris to handle climate change, with 27 percent of respondents believing she would do a better job compared to 9 percent for Trump. The same holds true for undecided White respondents (33 percent versus 4 percent) and Hispanic respondents (21 percent versus 11 percent).”

“The partisan divide was most significant among Black voters, with 66 percent supporting Harris and 18 percent backing Trump. . . .

“Among Hispanic voters, the partisan gap is narrower, with 45 percent intending to vote for Harris compared to 37 percent for Trump. Asian Americans in our poll leaned toward Harris as well, with 50 percent supporting her and 29 percent favoring Trump.“

“For undecided Black respondents, Trump was favored on several issues: immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border (32 percent versus 13 percent), relations with China (32 percent versus 12 percent), the war between Russia and Ukraine (24 percent versus 17 percent). On the war between Israel and Hamas, undecided Black respondents were evenly split, with 14 percent favoring Harris compared to 13 percent favoring Trump.”

In addition, “While Black Americans generally hold liberal views on immigration, the recent influx of migrants into economically deprived neighborhoods in cities like New York and Chicago, coupled with the rise of what some describe as ‘nativist’ movements in Black communities, may explain why immigration ranked higher among Black Trump supporters and why roughly two in ten Black voters support Trump.

“This is not to suggest that correlation equals causation; rather, it is important to note that this level of support for a Republican candidate is unprecedented and Trump’s alarmist rhetoric on immigration may speak to the sensibilities of some Black voters.”

Hola Carolina produced this video in 2020, describing itself as a “nonprofit organization providing a critical voice to the diversity of our community.” (Credit: YouTube)

205 Small Newsrooms to Split $20 Million

Lack of sufficient diversity at news organizations has long been cited for distrust in news media, adding significance to a new announcement from the philanthropic coalition Press Forward.

The coalition has a mission to inject at least $500 million into local news over five years, and on Wednesday it announced $20 million in grants to 205 small local newsrooms.

Forty percent “of grantees are headed by Black, Indigenous and other leaders of color, including:

“ In an interview with Editor & Publisher, Dale Anglin, director of Press Forward, shared the organization’s excitement about the response and the diversity of the recipient pool. ‘The recipients are extremely diverse, representing newsrooms dedicated to Black, Indigenous and Latino communities, LGBTQIA people and those living in urban and rural areas.’ She said the grantees’ diversity extends beyond geography and includes newly formed digital sites, radio stations, 100-year-old print outlets and college newsrooms.”

Sophie Culpepper added for Nieman Lab:

“Martin Reynolds, co-executive director of the Maynard Institute, was a signatory of an open letter that made the rounds last fall calling for Press Forward to distribute its funding equitably. He was also, in this open call, an application reviewer and an organization he co-founded (Oakland Voices) received funding, though he was not involved in that application.

“As a signatory of that letter, ‘it is exciting to see how 40% of grantees are BIPOC-led organizations, particularly since only 30% of applicants were BIPOC,’ Reynolds told me. He wonders why more BIPOC-led outlets didn’t apply, he added, and hopes Press Forward will explore any potential barriers that limit newsrooms from applying. (Anglin emphasized the work Press Forward did to get in front of as many communities and get the word out in as many ways as possible for this open call.)

“Reynolds appreciated that the application rubric explicitly named ‘communities of color’ under the addressing gaps in coverage criterion, but would have liked to see race mentioned more explicitly in other sections of the rubric, including the leadership section. . . .”

Perceptions Trump Facts on ‘Better Off’ Question

“More than half of Americans (52%) say they and their family are worse off today than they were four years ago, while 39% say they are better off and 8% volunteer that they are about the same,” Mary Claire Evans reported Friday for the Gallup organization.

“The latest findings are from a Sept. 16-28 poll, which also finds differences among partisans’ perceptions on this measure — Democrats (72%) are much more likely than independents (35%) or Republicans (7%) to view themselves as ‘better off.’

“The higher-than-usual percentage of U.S. adults who say they are worse off this year is largely owing to Republicans’ much greater likelihood to say this than opponents of the incumbent president’s party had been in prior election years. . . .”

In June, Journal-isms asked Samuel Myers Jr. (pictured, credit: X), a Black economist at the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey School of Public Affairs, who has joined others to educate younger generations of color to become Ph.D. economists, what is and what is not within the power of the U.S. president to control everyday prices.

He replied, “It is typically unusual for presidents to ‘control’ prices. Wage-price controls under the Carter Administration are often credited with one of the main sources of public discontent” causing President Jimmy Carter to lose to Ronald Reagan. “For more on the hyper-inflation during the Carter years and the policies implemented by Ray Marshall, the Secretary of Labor, see: < https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/dolchp08 >.”

“The specific things that presidents can do to affect price changes include import restrictions, currency exchange policies, critical supply management, and public displays of aversion to price increases among regulated companies. So, two points: a) it is possible for a president to affect prices, but b) historically, it has come at a high political cost.”

Myers also assessed news coverage of the issue (scroll down).

Asked about new Gallup finding, the professor added Saturday, “Perceptions do matter. And, while many economic indicators — e.g. unemployment rates or inflation rates — show that things are actually much better now than during the height of the pandemic, for political reasons, what matters is what people believe and not necessarily what the facts show.

“So, unfortunately, many current policy positions are being driven by influencers and the beliefs or perceptions and not by the hard facts.

“Let me also be clear, the hard facts are about the mean or median participants in the economy. The influencers and those driving many perceptions about the economy often are not at the mean or median. And, it doesn’t help a struggling person who is out of work to claim that unemployment rates are many times lower now than they were during the pandemic.”

Overall, Brian Stelter wrote for CNN, Bret Baier interrupted Vice President Kamala Harris “at least 38 times in 27 minutes, about twice as often as Baier interjected with Trump (at least 28 times in 36 minutes).” In the Guardian, Margaret Sullivan wrote, “This was grievance theater, not political journalism. But Harris got in her licks. She had her moments.” (Screen shot)

Harris Appearance on Fox Yields High Ratings

“Kamala Harris’ sit-down with Fox News’ Bret Baier Wednesday drew a 7.8 million viewers, easily beating Donald Trump’s town hall with Fox News’ Harris Faulkner, which drew 3.1 million viewers,” Ted Johnson reported for Deadline.

“The interview was Harris’ first appearance on Fox News. It was at times contentious, as Harris and Baier talked over one another at points. Harris at one point called out Baier for not running a complete clip in which Trump attacks opponents as ‘the enemy within.’ Baier later acknowledged that the wrong clip aired during the interview.

The interview came in a week in which Harris broadened her media appearances to include more nontraditional outlets; Trump supporters attacked what they called Harris’ handling of the 2007 murder of Black journalist Chauncey Bailey; the Marshall Project found that most inmates responding to a survey said they would vote for Trump; an ad from the GOP candidate running in a Black newspaper gave the wrong date for Election Day, leading to charges that the “mistake” was deliberate; and the news media examined the role of sexism in the campaign. All of this while continuing to discuss the unenthusiastic views of some Black men and other African Americans toward Harris.

The murder of Bailey (pictured) “has become a sound bite in the presidential election, featured in a national ad blitz by Donald Trump and supporters that seeks to paint Kamala Harris as soft on crime,” Grant Stringer reported Thursday for the San Jose Mercury News.

“Harris is expected to win California easily, so most Bay Area voters probably won’t see the pair of ads. They claim that Harris was too lenient as district attorney in San Francisco and failed 17 years ago to prevent the killing of Oakland Post editor Chauncey Bailey.

“However, a relative of Bailey’s and those familiar with the case say there’s no link between his assassination and Harris’ record as a prosecutor. . . .”

The Harris campaign, previously criticized for not doing enough media interviews, said Saturday, “This past week, top Harris-Walz campaign surrogates and advisors took over the airwaves – praising Vice president Harris’ Opportunity Agenda for Black Men across nationally syndicated Black radio shows. The media blitz comes as the Harris-Walz campaign continues efforts to reach Black voters where they are at, utilizing trusted surrogates to engage with Black Americans across the country through diverse mediums on the issues that matter most to them.

“Your voice is your vote and your vote is your power and never let anybody take your power from you,” Kamala Harris told Native youth in a 46-second campaign video released on Indigenous Peoples Day, Oct. 14.

“Earlier this week, Vice President Harris rolled out her Opportunity Agenda for Black Men, and joined Roland Martin Unfiltered, The Shade Room, and Charlamagne Tha God to discuss in detail how her vision for an opportunity economy will benefit Black Americans while also speaking directly to Black men about her Opportunity Agenda,” the Harris campaign continued.

Meanwhile, Nicole Lewis, Shannon Heffernan and Anna Flagg reported Thursday for the Marshall Project that “More than 54,000 people in 785 prisons and jails in 45 states and the District of Columbia responded” to the survey by the nonprofit news organization, which focuses on criminal justice.

It found :

In a complaint filed Oct. 13 with the state attorney general, the Michigan Legislative Black Caucus accused the campaign of Tom Barrett, a Republican vying for a Michigan congressional seat, of misleading Black voters to suppress turnout.

A full-page ad that appeared in the Oct. 2 issue of the weekly Michigan Bulletin, based in Lansing, featured the phrase “On November 6 VOTE FOR TOM BARRETT.” Election Day is Nov. 5.

“Volunteer publisher” Marcus Jefferson did not respond to an emailed query about whether the paper’s employees saw the ad before it was published.

Meanwhile, a week after former president Barack Obama questioned whether sexism was at play in the reluctance of some Black men to support Harris, The Washington Post ran a lengthy front-page piece by Maeve Reston and Ashley Parker under the headline, “Seeking a historic win, Harris faces a familiar foe: Sexism.” The subhead was, “Is America ready for its first woman president? Polling and interviews with many voters suggest the answer is yes — but with a lot of caveats.”

Writer Touré, now with theGrio, recalls Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs yelling at him over a line in a review Touré wrote for Rolling Stone and threatening to end the writer’s career. (Credit: YouTube)

Writers Urge Caution in Linking Others with Diddy

“Nearly a year into the torrent of hellish accusations of sexual assault, physical violence, and drugging involving multimedia mogul Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs, a circus of suspicion swirls around everything he ever touched as people relitigate known controversies and tidbits we never much thought about before,” music critic Craig Jenkins wrote Oct. 7 for Vulture.

“There’s an itch to depict Diddy as a Black Jeffrey Epstein, the ringleader of clandestine, A-list perversion.

“One hundred and 20 new accusers have come forward recently, a number of whom claim they met Combs as underaged prospective performers only to be drugged and assaulted. The scale of the misconduct alleged over the past year is breathtaking. But rumor baiting is eclipsing constructive reflection. The pattern seekers are more interested in uncovering a juicier story than finding justice for victims who must now compete with specious secret-society rhetoric and crude Diddy memes to be heard.”

Other writers are saying much the same. “The media needs to handle the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs saga with care,” reads a headline in Andscape over a piece by Shanita Hubbard, an adjunct sociology professor and author of “Ride-Or-Die: A Feminist Manifesto For the Well-Being Of Black Women.”

On HuffPost, Candice Frederick wrote, “social media users have been digging into the boundless belly of the internet for videos, photos and all else they can find on any celebrity in the 2000s that even marginally associated themselves with Combs’ White Parties and his allegedly more perilous freak-offs. (The discourse has often woefully conflated the two.)”

However, Frederick said, “It’s true that literally everyone who was anyone (and everyone who wanted to be anyone) in the ‘90s or 2000s likely encountered, partied, collaborated or was in a photo with Combs. Because he was just that ubiquitous — and highly influential.

“A perhaps more complicated truth is that many of Combs’ soirees were especially the place to be for the Black elite at the time. . . . Clearly, determining who could be an enabler in Combs’ case and any others like his is not so simple — and certainly can’t come from an out-of-context photo, video clip or social media activity.”

Credit: New York Amsterdam News

Safety Nets Fail Surviving Victims of Gun Violence

“Every day, an average of more than 200 Americans are hospitalized due to nonfatal firearm injuries,” Shannon Caffers wrote for the New York Amsterdam News in a series that began in August, “Hidden Costs: The Financial Costs of Gun Violence.” It is part of a larger, continuing project, “Beyond the Barrel of the Gun.”

“This series examines the wide-ranging costs of gun violence in America, and reveals how the country’s safety net programs are failing those whose lives are disrupted by this violence. It also highlights an array of grassroots groups, disability organizations, and hospital programs that are stepping up to fill the gap,” said the news organization, part of the Black press.

“Everytown for Gun Safety estimates that more than 73,000 nonfatal shootings take place across the nation each year. Yet the lasting toll of nonfatal gun violence is often hidden from view, especially in marginalized, under-resourced neighborhoods.”

The series’ key findings:

RTDNA Spotlights Banking Bias Against Indigenous

“One-third of Native community members have encountered bias and/or exclusion from the financial services sector while seeking services related to banking, lending, saving, credit, financial planning and more. That’s double that of the general U.S. adult population,” Molly McCluskey wrote Oct. 14 for the Radio Television Digital News Association.

The article’s headline was, “Native Americans and banking access: What journalists should know.”

The one-third figure comes from a poll by the National Endowment for Financial Education published in November 2023, which surveyed 750 adult Indigenous Americans from across the United States, who identified as American Indian, Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.

“Additionally, 17% of respondents said neither they nor anyone in their household own a bank account, which is nearly quadruple the national estimate of 4.5% of households, according to the FDIC,” McCluskey wrote.

She added, “In 2019, Wells Fargo settled a lawsuit with the Navajo Nation for ‘predatory and unlawful’ practices against the Navajo people. The bank agreed to pay $6.5 million.

“As the Navajo Times reported, ‘The Navajo Nation and its members entrusted Wells Fargo with their finances and personal information,’ stated the complaint. ‘In return, Wells Fargo preyed on members of the Navajo Nation, including Navajo elders, who are some of the Navajo Nation’s most vulnerable citizens.’

“Overall, the bank now owes billions of dollars in lawsuits while also touting its significantly smaller investments in Native communities nationwide. . . .”

Al Jazeera cameraman Fadi al-Wahidi has fallen into a coma while waiting for Israeli authorities to approve his medical evacuation from Gaza, the network reported Thursday. “He was shot in the neck by Israeli forces while reporting one week ago.” (Credit: Al Jazeera/YouTube)

Urgent Plea Seeks Aid for Journalists Hit by Israel

“Three leading press freedom organizations, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU), and Reporters Without Borders (RSF), on Tuesday, October 15, urgently called on the Israeli military office responsible for humanitarian coordination, known as COGAT, to authorize the evacuation of two critically wounded journalists who require immediate, lifesaving medical treatment,” CPJ reported.

“The letter, a rare public plea, follows frustrated diplomatic efforts and direct appeals to COGAT by the three organizations since the journalists — Ali Al-Attar and Fadi Al Wahidi, camera operators for Al Jazeera — sustained severe injuries while working in Gaza last week. In the letter, the organizations called for expedited approval for the journalists’ medical evacuation to Jordan or Qatar.”

On Thursday, Al Jazeera reported that Al Wahidi “has fallen into a coma while waiting for Israeli authorities to approve his medical evacuation from Gaza. He was shot in the neck by Israeli forces while reporting one week ago.”

Reporters Without Borders said the two journalists were seriously injured by Israeli forces, both hit while covering the Israeli army’s siege in northern Gaza. “On 7 October, Ali al-Attar, a cameraman for Al-Jazeera, was hit by shelling in Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza. The following day, Fadi [Al Wahidi], also a cameraman for the Qatari news channel, was gravely injured in the encircled camp of Jabalia in northern Gaza.”

The Canadian Broadcasting Corp. reports Saturday on Cuba’s second total power blackout in two days. CubaNet reported Sunday, “According to videos on social media, multiple cacerolazos and peaceful protests were taking place during the night of October 19. The demonstrations were concentrated mainly in the provinces of Havana and Santiago de Cuba.” (Credit: YouTube)

Cuba Cracks Down, Then a Massive Power Blackout

Cuba is going through its worst economic crisis since the fall of the Soviet Union, with an island-wide power blackout and an incoming hurricane Oscar adding to the catastrophe.

But even before the country first lost electricity Friday after a major power plant failure, independent journalists were feeling a crackdown by the dictatorship, reports Journal-isms correspondent Julio Antonio Rojas from Havana.

As explained in this space last week, a new social communication law, which bans independent media outlets in Cuba, went into effect on Oct. 4. In line with the new law, the Cuban government has begun to round up independent journalists who do not toe the government line, threatening them with jail and prompting some to leave the country.

Rojas reports that the Cuban Institute for the Freedom of Expression and Press Office (ICLEP) registered 36 violations of the new law, of which 29 were violations of freedom of expression and seven of freedom of the press.

The Cuban music magazine AMPM was forced to announce an “indefinite pause” in its publications in the face of constant pressure from the State Security.

Short Takes


Mel Showers discusses his life as he accepts induction into the Alabama Broadcasters Association Hall of Fame in Birmingham in 2015. (Credit: YouTube)

WCIV-TV in Charleston, S.C., reports that “A new historical marker in downtown Charleston has been unveiled, shedding light on a grim chapter of the city’s history related to slavery.” (Credit: YouTube)

People of Mexican descent, including U.S.-born citizens, were put on trains and buses and deported to Mexico during the Great Depression. In Los Angeles, up to 75,000 were deported by train in one year, according to research by a former L.A. student. (Credit: Los Angeles Times)

“Outdoor Afro launched Making Waves during 2019 in response to the alarming number of Black children who drown today tied to the historic prohibition of Black access to beaches and public pools. It is Outdoor Afro’s goal to help every Black child and their caregiver within its sphere of influence learn how to swim.” (Credit: Candace Dantes)

(Credit: YouTube)

At left is Ismaël Matungulu, the director of Radio Saké FM. He is broadcasting from a displacement camp in Goma after escaping an M23 offensive in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. (Credit: Fidèle Kitsa/The New Humanitarian)

To subscribe at no cost, please send an email to journal-isms+subscribe@groups.io and say who you are.

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor

Richard Prince’s Journal-isms originates from Washington. It began in print before most of us knew what the internet was, and it would like to be referred to as a “column.” Any views expressed in the column are those of the person or organization quoted and not those of any other entity. Send tips, comments and concerns to Richard Prince at journal-isms+owner@groups.io

About Richard Prince

View previous columns (after Feb. 13, 2016).

View previous columns (before Feb. 13, 2016)

Exit mobile version