Articles Feature

Powell, Obama Maintain Media Help Trump

by richard11935

Coates: Whites’ ‘Safe Space’ Is Protected

Fear of Change Isn’t Racism, but It Is Exploitable

Newspaper Takes Home One for Civility

Paper Fought for Release of White Mugshots, Too

In Story of Killing by Police, How Much Is Racial?

Media Mostly Ignore Reporter’s Arrest at Pipeline

Short Takes

Colin Powell appears on "Meet the Press" on Sept. 6, 2015. In 2013, Powell said on the show that that the Republican party is suffering from a “dark vein of intolerance” and that some in the party seem to “look down on minorities.” (Credit: William B. Plowman/NBC News)
Colin Powell appears on “Meet the Press” on Sept. 6, 2015. Leaked emails show that he balked at appearing on the show with former vice president  Dick Cheney and his daughter, Liz. Two years earlier, Powell said on the show that the Republican Party was suffering from a “dark vein of intolerance” and that some in the party seem to “look down on minorities.” (Credit: William B. Plowman/NBC News)

Coates: Whites’ ‘Safe Space’ Is Protected

Amid the eye-popping statements by Colin Powell revealed in hacked emails made public Tuesday was his belief, seconded this week by President Obama, that news media coverage was helping Donald J. Trump.

That help was magnified when the media criticized solely on the “optics” Hillary Clinton’s statement that half of Trump’s supporters are bigoted, Ta-Nehisi Coates added this week.

“. . . In the emails, Mr. Powell blamed the news media for helping fuel Mr. Trump’s candidacy,” Michael D. Shear reported Wednesday in the New York Times. “In December 2015, he turned down a request from CNN’s Fareed Zakaria to discuss Mr. Trump. ‘It is time to start ignoring him. You guys are playing his game, you are his oxygen,’ Mr. Powell responded. In August 2015, Mr. Powell predicted that Mr. Trump would ‘take it to the convention’ in part because news networks were chasing ratings. . . .”

The same day the hacked emails surfaced, Obama vented at a campaign rally for Clinton in Philadelphia that he was “frustrated with how this campaign is covered,” Oliver Darcy reported for businessinsider.com.

” ‘I’m just telling the truth. Guys in the back, I’m just telling you the truth about how I feel about this,” the president said, speaking directly to the members of the media toward the back of the rally.

“Obama then asked the crowd: ‘Do you mind if I just vent for a second?’

” ‘You know, you don’t grade the presidency on a curve,’ he said. ‘This is serious business.’

“Obama contended that Clinton and Trump were starkly different on a number of issues.

” ‘You want to debate who is more fit to be our president?’ he asked. ‘One candidate has traveled to more countries than any secretary of state ever has, has more qualifications than pretty much anyone who has ever run for this job, and the other, who isn’t fit in any way, shape, or form to represent this country abroad and be commander-in-chief.’

” ‘And Donald Trump says stuff every day that used to be considered as disqualifying for being president,’ Obama continued. ‘And yet because he says it over and over and over again, the press just gives up, and they just say, “Well, yeah. OK!” ‘

It should be noted that in the hacked emails from Powell, a Republican, former secretary of state and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also criticized Clinton. “Everything H.R.C. touches she kind of screws up with hubris,” Powell wrote.

It is also true that Obama’s public statements were self-serving and that the news media have made an effort to be tougher on both candidates, even though Trump’s base, in particular, appears to be impervious to facts undermining the credibility of its candidate.

Still, journalists have given the issue of false equivalence — equating Clinton’s shortcomings with Trump’s — more attention in recent weeks. Nicholas Kristof, a New York Times columnist, expressed alarm Thursday that “A CNN/ORC poll this month found that by a margin of 15 percentage points, voters thought Donald Trump was ‘more honest and trustworthy’ than Hillary Clinton. Let’s be frank: This public perception is completely at odds with all evidence,” Kristof wrote.

Kristof added, “I wonder if journalistic efforts at fairness don’t risk normalizing Trump, without fully acknowledging what an abnormal candidate he is. . . . We should be guard dogs, not lap dogs, and when the public sees Trump as more honest than Clinton, something has gone wrong. . . .”

Ta-Nehisi Coates, the Atlantic commentator and best-selling author, expanded on the racial aspect of the discussion on Monday in discussing Clinton’s comment Friday that half of Donald Trump’s supporters are motivated by some form of bigotry. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it,” Clinton said. “And unfortunately, there are people like that, and he has lifted them up.” Clinton apologized for estimating the figure at “half.”

Many commentators contended that Clinton had crossed a line in calling out Trump’s supporters, rather than simply Trump himself.

Coates wrote that that was the wrong response.

“For much of this campaign journalists have attacked Hillary Clinton for being evasive and avoiding hard questioning from their ranks. And then the second Clinton is forthright and says something revealing, she is attacked — not for the substance of what she’s said — but simply for having said it. This hypocrisy carries a chilling implicit message: Lie to me. Lie to the country. Lie to everyone. This weekend was not just another misanalysis, it was a shocking betrayal of the journalistic mission which should urge the revelation of truth as opposed to the propagation of hot takes, Washington jargon, and politics-speak.”

He continued, “The shame reflects an ugly and lethal trend in this country’s history — an ever-present impulse to ignore and minimize racism, an aversion to calling it by its name. For nearly a century and a half, this country deluded itself into thinking that its greatest calamity, the Civil War, had nothing to do with one of its greatest sins, enslavement.

“It deluded itself in this manner despite available evidence to the contrary. Lynchings, pogroms, and plunder proceeded from this fiction. Writers, journalists, and educators embroidered a national lie, and thus a safe space for the violent tempers of those who needed to be white was preserved. . . .

“The safe space for the act of being white endures today. This weekend, the media, an ostensibly great American institution, saw it challenged and — not for the first time — organized to preserve it. For speaking a truth, backed up by data, Clinton was accused of promoting bigotry. No. The true crime was endangering white consciousness. . . .”

Fear of Change Isn’t Racism, but It Is Exploitable

Is Donald J. Trump a racist or simply pandering to racial fears — and does it make a difference? It does, according to Ian Haney López, a constitutional law scholar and author of three books on race, including his latest, “Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class.”

López appeared on a panel Tuesday at the News Leadership Conference of the American Society of News Editors and Associated Press Media Editors in Philadelphia. He argued that Trump is the latest in a line of politicians manipulating racial fears, that candidates following his strategy are likely to harm the country for at least two decades, and that news media broaching these topics should consult people who have seriously studied racism.

“It’s as if we’re all experts — but we’re not,” López said.

“Racism is overwhelmingly a white phenomenon,” he said at a panel titled, “Lame Ducks and Dog Whistles: Race, Precedence and the Presidency.” “How does it work in regard to Latinos? In regard to Muslims? Those aren’t easy questions,” he said. One needs to discuss the differences in order to have “effective conversations.”

Many Trump supporters are afraid that their way of life is being threatened, and that’s what Trump is exploiting, López said. “He is a strategic racist, someone who appeals to the worst aspect of the American electorate. . . . Mitt Romney was a strategic racist when he was tying [President] Obama to welfare.”

Others on the panel saw things differently. Aminda “Mindy” Marques Gonzalez, executive editor of the Miami Herald, said she did not see a difference between someone who says racist things and someone who is racist. Further, she said, “Most of us were too timid at first to call it out.”

Otis Sanford, former editorial page editor at the Commercial Appeal in Memphis who now teaches at the University of Memphis, recalled, among other indicators, a Justice Department suit against the Trump organization, in which the agency charged in 1978 that “racially discriminatory conduct by Trump agents has occurred with such frequency that it has created a substantial impediment to the full enjoyment of equal opportunity.”

However, López maintained that whether Trump is an actual racist goes to what’s in his heart, which is irrelevant.

This is how manipulation of racial fears works, López wrote Aug. 2 in the Nation:

“Only a minority of Trump’s supporters forthrightly embrace white superiority. In campaigning, then, Trump must carve a course between mobilizing voters with tales of racial peril and not obviously appealing to them as outright bigots.

“This has always been part of the art of dog whistling, though it does force a clarification of the metaphor. Sometimes dog whistling works like a secret handshake, benign to outsiders but clearly understood by those in the know. George W. Bush practiced it this way, for instance in using terms like ‘compassionate conservative’ and ‘faith-based initiative.’ To most, these phrases seemed anodyne, yet as journalist and author Craig Unger explains, Bush intended them to signal to Christian fundamentalists his commitment to their ascendance.

“But when seeking to appeal to widely condemned group animosities — such as racism, sexism, and homophobia — dog whistling works differently. The most important goal becomes to hide the full ugliness of the underlying message from the target audience itself.

“The racial dog whistle is a con: In the very moment it claims to be boldly telling politically incorrect truths, say about crime, immigration, terrorism, and trade, in fact it is surreptitiously manipulating people’s deepest fears about racial loss and betrayal. (Actually, it’s a double con, for in turn dog whistling exploits these anxieties to win working- and middle-class support for politicians indebted to the billionaire donor class — or, as with Trump, themselves the self-interested billionaires.)

“So Trump must observe certain limits. . . .”

Win or lose nationally, López said, Trump will be successful in many local districts. There, admiring future candidates will mimic Trump’s strategy. “We will be living with this for another two decades, at least,” Lopez said. “It’s like he’s ripped the Band-Aid off this deep wound.”

Moderator Keith Woods, NPR vice president for diversity in news and operations, concluded, “Maybe for the first time in our discussion of race, everybody’s in. Our challenge is now how to make journalism out of that.”


A diverse array of civic leaders discusses participation in the Community Civility Counts initiative.

Newspaper Takes Home One for Civility

No name calling. No bullying. What a concept, especially for an entire community.

A Community Civility Counts initiative sponsored by the Munster, Ind.-based Times Media Co., in which civility is promoted in the community, in the newspaper and in the classroom, won the Innovation of the Year award from the Associated Press Media Editors Tuesday at the News Leadership Conference in Philadelphia.

Editors attending the conference, held by the APME and the American Society of Newspaper Editors, decided among three finalists on Tuesday.

“ ‘This is great recognition for something that started right here in the Region,’ Editor Bob Heisse said Wednesday, Kaitlin Lange of Ball State University reported. “The Gary Chamber of Commerce and The Times Media Co. partnered and rolled out Community Civility Counts, its ‘Together we Win’ slogan and #CivilityCounts hashtag. It has grown into an awareness campaign that’s gaining national and international attention for simply doing the right thing.

“ ‘I think we’re all tired of the name calling and bullying, and it was great to share our campaign with others,’ Heisse said. A video covering campaign highlights was shown to the audience at the conference, and is attached to this story.

“The Times and Gary chamber and other partners have worked over the last year on various initiatives to bring civility to the community. The Times refuses to publish vitriolic speech and does not host anonymous online comments.

“ ‘This is something any of you can do in your communities,’ Heisse told news leaders. ‘It’s a concept that our community has embraced.’ . . .”

Paper Fought for Release of White Mugshots, Too

Hollis R. Towns
Hollis R. Towns

When Hollis R. Towns was awarded the 15th annual Robert G. McGruder Award for Diversity Leadership on Tuesday, one accomplishment for which Towns was cited was successfully pressing local police to release mugshots of white suspects as well as those of color.

Towns is executive editor and vice president of the Asbury Park Press in Neptune, N.J., and the award was presented by the Associated Press Media Editors and the American Society of News Editors at their News Leadership conference in Philadelphia.

Alesha Williams Boyd, Gannett NJ regional director of engagement, explained for Journal-isms:

“The nearly all-white police forces in both [Monmouth and Ocean] counties would routinely release arrest photos of minorities caught in drug stings and horrific crimes, but most often did not present photos of white suspects who posted bail or were involved in white-collar crimes. Hollis used the bully pulpit of the Press to demand that police release all suspect photos and, when there was resistance, he took the fight to the public.

“If no mug shot were released, each police story would end with this phrase: ‘The Press requested a photo of the suspect but police declined to provide one.’ The pressure eventually convinced several police departments to change their ways. Ocean County quietly posted its mug shots on the county jail website.”

The newspaper noted when the award was announced in July, “Towns is being honored for championing diversity in both hiring and news coverage at the newspaper. He raised minority employment at the Press from less than 10 percent in 2008 to 25 percent in 2016. The senior management team at the newspaper is 44 percent women and 33 percent minority. . . .”

In Story of Killing by Police, How Much Is Racial?

A white cop shooting and killing an unarmed black man is news. So is a white cop not shooting and killing an unarmed black man — and being fired, purportedly for not taking the black man’s life.

Ronald Williams and his now 5-month-old son this year. (Courtesy the Poole family)
Ronald D. Williams Jr. and his now 5-month-old son this year. (Courtesy, Poole family)

That story, based on reporting by Sean D. Hamill of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, went viral this week. But as Hamill told Journal-isms by telephone on Thursday, it’s not at all clear how much of the story is about race.

The New Pittsburgh Courier, a member of the black press, cast the tale Thursday in racial terms.

“Time and time again we’ve read and reported incidents in which unarmed Black men and women were shot down by police,” Charise Frazier wrote. “But this time, a West Virginia officer lost his job for not shooting a man who held an unloaded gun because he reportedly put other officers in danger.

“On May 6, Officer Stephen Mader responded to a domestic disturbance call in Weirton, West Virginia. When Mader arrived on the scene, he was confronted by Ronald D. Williams Jr., a 23-year-old Black man, reports the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Williams’ girlfriend made the call to police.

“Mader, who is White, served as a Marine in the military and said he used de-escalation skills learned in training to evaluate the ‘whole person’ before reacting abruptly he said in an interview with the Post-Gazette:
‘I saw then he had a gun, but it was not pointed at me,’ Mader said, who observed Williams’ handgun was in his right hand hanging downward, pointed at the ground.

“According to Mader, he used a calm voice and told Williams to lower his gun. Williams responded with, ‘Just shoot me.’ ‘I’m not going to shoot you, brother,’ Mader said back. He recalled Williams flicked his wrist to get him to react.

“ ‘I thought I was going to be able to talk to him and deescalate it. I knew it was a suicide-by-cop situation,’ Mader told the Post-Gazette.

“But all of Mader’s training couldn’t prepare him for what happened next. Shortly after, two more officers arrived on the scene. Williams walked toward the officers, waving his gun, according to the Post-Gazette. One of the officers aimed and fired at Williams, striking him dead with a shot to the back of the head [as Williams walked toward them waving his gun — later found to be unloaded.] The two responding officers were also White.

“After the shooting, the Weirton Police Department engaged in a series of missteps. An investigator was brought in who promptly took a week-long vacation, and the department also refused to publicly release Williams’ name for three days. . . .”

Here’s where it gets tricky.

Hamill reported Sunday, “As a former officer, Mr. Mader is all too aware of the interest this case might have for those on either side of the ongoing controversy over the shootings of black men by white officers across the country.

“Mr. Mader is white and Mr. Williams was black. But Mr. Mader said the other two officers — who are also white — did the right thing given their situation.

“ ‘They did not have the information I did,’ he said. ‘They don’t know anything I heard. All they know is [Mr. Williams] is waving a gun at them. It’s a shame it happened the way it did, but, I don’t think they did anything wrong.’  . . .”

In the same story, Hamill wrote, “Jack Dolance, an attorney for the Williams’ family, said that how and why Mr. Mader was fired ‘is pretty clear evidence of their policy and that the way they feel [the shooting of Mr. Williams] should have been handled. Not only do they think he should have been shot and killed, but shot and killed more quickly.’ . . .”

In his first story on the incident on May 22, Hamill quoted Heather Poole, Mr. Williams’ half-sister. “She and other family of Mr. Williams, who was African-American, have consulted with both the NAACP and the Black Lives Matter organizations on hiring a civil rights attorney to help them,” he wrote.

In a follow-up story Sunday, Hamill noted the “peculiar” way the case was being handled. “But a case that has been handled by local law enforcement from the first day on with some peculiar twists — failing to publicly name Mr. Williams for three days, the assignment of an investigator who left for a week-long vacation the next day and tension with Mr. Williams’ family — only got more peculiar,” he wrote.

Could that be because authorities knew about the racial dynamics they were dealing with?

The case isn’t going away. Hamill wrote Thursday that the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia said that it has filed intent to sue notices with the city of Weirton and the West Virginia State Police. Both denied its Freedom of Information Act request for records related to the killing.

Media Mostly Ignore Reporter’s Arrest at Pipeline

“When Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman (9/4/16) asked security guards at the Dakota Access Pipeline construction project why they were using pepper spray and dogs to attack Native American protesters, the guards soon backed off, taking their mace and attack dogs with them,” Jim Naureckas reported Thursday for Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting.

“It was a dramatic lesson in how journalism can defend the rights of citizens.

“The state of North Dakota had a response to this kind of journalism: It issued a warrant for Goodman’s arrest, charging her with criminal trespassing. This is an extraordinary action; Jack McDonald, a lawyer for the North Dakota Newspaper Association and for the Bismarck Tribune, told the Tribune that in 40 years of doing media law in the state he’s never heard of a reporter being charged with trespassing (9/15/16).

“So how did reporters respond to one of their own being threatened with arrest for doing her job? Mostly, they ignored it. . . .”

Short Takes

 

Facebook users: “Like” “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” on Facebook.

Follow Richard Prince on Twitter @princeeditor

Richard Prince’s Journal-isms originates from Washington. It began in print before most of us knew what the internet was, and it would like to be referred to as a “column.” Any views expressed in the column are those of the person or organization quoted and not those of any other entity.
Send tips, comments and concerns to Richard Prince at journal-isms-owner@yahoogroups.com

To be notified of new columns, contact journal-isms-subscribe@yahoogroups.com and tell us who you are.

 

Related posts

An Independent Afro-Cuban Journalist’s Statement to the Journal-isms Roundtable

richard

Why Was Quincy Jones at the NABJ Convention?

richard

‘Roseanne’ Train Wreck Raises Issues of Race in TV Coverage

richard

1 comment

richard September 17, 2016 at 8:04 pm

Comments from The Root:

Gregory Benz

The media has helped Trump? Lets face it: over 90% of the media are Democrats, and they are in the tank for all other Democrats, including Obama and Clinton. But they have given Trump exposure because he is actually DOING something every day, and they have to cover it. Clinton has mostly been in hiding, doing nothing to make news, and the media have been reluctant to even mention her e-mail crimes.

Carmichael Mackenzie

@Gregory Benz It seems like I make an effort to always attack your comments. No I don’t, I just find it difficult to comprehend your analysis. For example, if you did read the article in its entirety – how could you have made such a comment? The different analyses, perspectives and objectives do not comport to your analyses.

It appears to me that one, you are not objective, two, you are biased, and three, you either most often do not read these articles, but respond purely on just the headline/caption.

Then you also told a lie, which suggests to me that you are biased. If you have been seriously paying attention, one, you would have noticed that Hillary’s emails have been the target of the media, her emails have been the most talked about subject in the media in this presidential cycle. Her emails seem like they have been talked about at least 5 million times.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.